Abstract

Clustered binary data arise frequently in medical research such as cross-over clinical trials and twin studies. For the analysis of such data either a random-effects model or a conditional likelihood approach can be used. In this paper, we compare numerically the random-effects model estimator and the conditional likelihood estimator and discuss their relative merits for the analysis of binary data.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call