Abstract

The reaction kinetics for the liquid phase synthesis of a racemic mixture of the secondary butyl alcohols (SBA) from linear butene isomers (1-butene (1B); cis-2-butene ( c2B); trans-2-butene ( t2B)) and water (W) using a macroporous sulfonic acid ion exchange resin as catalyst were determined experimentally in a multiphase CSTR in the temperature range 39–433 K at 6–8 MPa. This range of pressures is necessary to dissolve butenes in the aqueous phase and to ensure a liquid state of all components. For temperatures higher than 423 K the reaction kinetics for the used catalyst size are influenced by mass transfer resistances within the catalyst matrix. The reaction takes place in the water swollen gel phase of the catalysts microspheres. Due to the large excess of water in the gel phase the compositions in the gel phase, in the macropore fluid, and in the catalyst surrounding aqueous phase are assumed to be identical. According to the literature the reaction is rather catalyzed by hydrated acid protons ( specific catalysis) than by polymer-bonded-SO 3H groups ( general catalysis). The experimental results can therefore be described sufficiently by a pseudo-homogeneous 3-parameter rate expression in aqueous phase activities. The forward reaction is first-order in butene. The reverse reaction is first-order in secondary butyl alcohol. The activation energy was determined to be 108 kJ/mol. Practically no pressure dependence could be observed for pressures exceeding 6 MPa. The ever-present isomerization of the linear butenes on acid catalysts was found to be remarkably faster than the hydration of butenes to SBA. Therefore, the isomerization is considered to be always in equilibrium during the olefin hydration. The formation of the possible by-product di- sec-butyl ether (DSBE) was never observed to a measurable extent. Simultaneous chemical and phase equilibria were investigated theoretically using the volume translated Peng–Robinson equation of state (VTPR-EoS) in combination with a g E -mixing rule. Parameters of the used g E -model were adjusted to experimental ternary liquid–liquid equilibrium (LLE) data.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call