Abstract
Herbert A. Simon. The logic of rational decision. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 16 no. 63 (1965), pp. 169–186. - Herbert A. Simon. The logic of heuristic decision making. The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 1–20. - Robert Binkley. Comments on H. Simon's “The logic of heuristic decision making.”The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 21–26. - Nuel D. Belnap Jr. Comments on H. Simon's “The logic of heuristic decision making.”The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 27–31. - Herbert A. Simon. Reply to comments. The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 32–35. - Nicholas Rescher. Semantic foundations for the logic of preference. The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 37–62. - Alan Ross Anderson. Comments on N. Rescher's “Semantic foundations for the logic of preference.”The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 63–70. - Robert Ackermann. Comments on N. Rescher's “Semantic foundations for the logic of preference.”The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 71–76. - Nicholas Rescher. Reply to comments. The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 77–79. - Donald Davidson. The logical form of action sentences. The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 81–95. - E. J. Lemmon. Comments on D. Davidson's “The logical form of action sentences.”The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 96–103. - Hector-Neri Castañeda. Comments on D. Davidson's “The logical form of action sentences.”The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 104–112. - Roderick M. Chisholm. Comments on D. Davidson's “The logical form of action sentences.”The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 113–114. - Donald Davidson. Reply to comments. The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 115–120. - Georg Henrik von Wright. The logic of action—a sketch. The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 121–136. - Roderick M. Chisholm. Comments on von Wright's “The logic of action.”The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 137–139. - John Robison. Comments on von Wright's “The logic of action.”The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 140–143. - Georg Henrik von Wright. Reply to comments. The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 144–146. - Alan Ross Anderson. Appendix I. The formal analysis of normative systems. The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 147–213. - Nicholas Rescher. Appendix II. Aspects of action. The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 215–219. - Volume 38 Issue 1
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.