Abstract

ABSTRACT This article explores Cambridge University librarian Henry Bradshaw’s development of tests for the authenticity of works attributed to Chaucer and his application of these principles to two disputed works: the Middle English Romaunt of the Rose and the Tale of Gamelyn. It makes use of unpublished archival papers and reconsiders historical editorial approaches using methods from the digital humanities to display and analyze Bradshaw’s data. After establishing the nature of these rhyme tests and the context of their development, I consider their later use by Walter W. Skeat in the Clarendon edition. I argue that Skeat reached conclusions different from those of Bradshaw because he misunderstood the purpose of Bradshaw’s rhyme tests and their intended relationship to manuscript evidence. This realization has implications for contemporary Chaucer scholarship, which builds upon Skeat’s textual work in the Oxford and Riverside editions.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.