Abstract
ObjectiveTo determine if bilateral absent or reverse end-diastolic (ARED) flow in the two umbilical arteries (UAs) at the perivesical (PVC) segment represents a more severe degree of hemodynamic compromise than unilateral ARED flow at the PVC segment in singleton pregnancies complicated by intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR).MethodsThis was a prospective observational study. One hundred nine fetuses with IUGR underwent a total of 225 ultrasound (US) examinations. We measured the pulsatility index (PI) from the two UAs at the PVC segment, UA in the free floating cord (FFC), middle cerebral artery (MCA), ductus venosus (DV) and the aortic isthmus blood flow index (IFI). Three groups were classified according to bilateral positive end-diastolic (PED) flow, unilateral ARED flow or bilateral ARED flow in the UAs at the PVC segment.ResultsThe proportions of US examinations with PED flow, unilateral ARED flow and bilateral ARED flow in the UAs were 54.7%, 20.4%, and 24.9%, respectively. At the last US examination, the IFI z-scores were significantly lower in the bilateral ARED group (-6.28±4.30) compared to the unilateral ARED group (-1.72±3.18, p<0.05) and the bilateral PED group (-0.83±2.36, p<0.05), the DV-PI z-scores were significantly higher in the bilateral ARED group (2.15±3.79) compared to the bilateral PED group (0.64±1.50, p<0.05). Before 32 weeks of gestation, the interval between US examination and delivery was significantly shorter in the bilateral ARED group (8.9 days ±8.2) than the unilateral ARED group (15.9 days ±13.4, p<0.05) and the bilateral PED group (30.3 days±25.7, p<0.05).ConclusionThere are significant differences in fetal blood fluxes between left and right UA. Doppler examination at the PVC segment significantly improves the comparability of UA-PI between two successive US examinations and allows a longitudinal and independent hemodynamic investigation of each UA. Examination of a single UA in free floating cord may miss a large fraction of unilateral ARED flow. In singleton IUGR fetuses, a bilateral ARED flow in the UAs at the PVC segment indicates more severe hemodynamic compromise and worse fetal conditions than unilateral ARED flow.
Highlights
Fetuses with early-onset intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) are at increased risk for adverse short- and long-term outcomes [1,2]
The main objective of the present study was to determine if bilateral absent or reverse end-diastolic (ARED) flow in the two umbilical arteries (UAs) at the perivesical (PVC) segment represents a more severe degree of hemodynamic compromise than unilateral ARED flow at the PVC segment in singleton pregnancies complicated by intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR)
Our results describe the hemodynamic status for each fetus at a given moment, in order to describe the relationship between the two UAs at the PVC segment and three other sites: the middle cerebral artery, aortic isthmus and ductus venosus
Summary
Fetuses with early-onset intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) are at increased risk for adverse short- and long-term outcomes [1,2]. It was suggested that the UAs should be sampled in a free-floating loop of the umbilical cord (FFC), since the indices are higher when sampling occurs at the fetal end and lower at the placental end of the umbilical cord[5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. These differences are significant regardless of gestational age but do not seem to have an impact in clinical practice. The main objective of the present study was to determine if bilateral absent or reverse end-diastolic (ARED) flow in the two UAs at the perivesical (PVC) segment represents a more severe degree of hemodynamic compromise than unilateral ARED flow at the PVC segment in singleton pregnancies complicated by intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.