Abstract

Recommendations for hemodynamic assessment and support in sepsis and septic shock in resource-limited settings are largely lacking. In this chapter, we reviewed the literature and provided recommendations regarding hemodynamic assessment and support, taking into consideration aspects of efficacy and effectiveness, availability and feasibility, and affordability and safety. We suggest using capillary refill time, skin mottling scores, and skin temperature gradients and suggest passive leg raise test to guide fluid resuscitation. We recommend crystalloid solutions as the initial fluid of choice and recommend initial fluid resuscitation with 30 ml/kg in the first 3 h but with extreme caution in settings where there is lack of mechanical ventilation. Patients with severe malaria or severe dengue without hypotension should not receive fluid bolus therapy. We recommend against early start of vasopressors and suggest starting a vasopressor in patients with persistent hypotension after initial fluid resuscitation with at least 30 ml/kg, but earlier when there is lack of access to mechanical ventilation, and recommend using norepinephrine (noradrenaline) as first-line vasopressor. We suggest in patients with suspected bacterial sepsis starting an inotrope with persistence of plasma lactate >2 mmol/l or persistence of skin mottling or prolonged capillary refill time when plasma lactate cannot be measured and only after initial fluid resuscitation. We suggest the use of dobutamine as first-line inotrope, recommend administering vasopressors through a central venous line, and suggest administering vasopressors and inotropes via a central venous line using a syringe or infusion pump when available.

Highlights

  • Recommendations for care in patients with sepsis or septic shock are largely based on evidence originating from resource-rich settings [1]

  • 1 Simple bedside tools We suggest using capillary refill time, skin mottling scores, and, if to assess tissue affordable, skin temperature gradients to assess adequacy of tissue perfusion perfusion in pediatric and adult sepsis and septic shock, either alone or in combination (UG)

  • In order to avoid delays in initial resuscitation, it is advisable that wards carrying for patients with sepsis or septic shock stockpile crystalloid solutions for their immediate availability, to avoid delaying initial fluid resuscitation (UG)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recommendations for care in patients with sepsis or septic shock are largely based on evidence originating from resource-rich settings [1]. Dondorp Mahidol–Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU), Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. Schultz Mahidol–Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU), Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. As recognition of hypoperfusion and return to normal perfusion, and detection of fluid responsiveness, could avoid under- and over-resuscitation as well as underand overuse of vasoactive agents, (1) there is need for affordable bedside tools for tissue perfusion monitoring and (2) a better understanding of practicalities of passive leg raise tests in these settings; as costs and availability of, and indications for, intravenous fluids could be different in resource-limited settings, (3) advises regarding the preferable type of intravenous fluid to be used during fluid resuscitation, as well as (4) amounts and timing of intravenous fluids for sepsis shock in resource-limited ICUs, are essential.

Simple Bedside Tools to Assess Tissue Perfusion
Fluid strategies
Vasopressors and inotropes
The Passive
Fluid Strategies
Amounts and Timing of IV Fluids
Vasopressors and Inotropes
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call