Abstract

BackgroundRecommendations for haemodynamic assessment and support in sepsis and septic shock in resource-limited settings are largely lacking.MethodsA task force of six international experts in critical care medicine, all of them members of the Global Intensive Care Working Group of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and with extensive bedside experience in resource-limited intensive care units, reviewed the literature and provided recommendations regarding haemodynamic assessment and support, keeping aspects of efficacy and effectiveness, availability and feasibility and affordability and safety in mind.ResultsWe suggest using capillary refill time, skin mottling scores and skin temperature gradients; suggest a passive leg raise test to guide fluid resuscitation; recommend crystalloid solutions as the initial fluid of choice; recommend initial fluid resuscitation with 30 ml/kg in the first 3 h, but with extreme caution in settings where there is a lack of mechanical ventilation; recommend against an early start of vasopressors; suggest starting a vasopressor in patients with persistent hypotension after initial fluid resuscitation with at least 30 ml/kg, but earlier when there is lack of vasopressors and mechanical ventilation; recommend using norepinephrine (noradrenaline) as a first-line vasopressor; suggest starting an inotrope with persistence of plasma lactate >2 mmol/L or persistence of skin mottling or prolonged capillary refill time when plasma lactate cannot be measured, and only after initial fluid resuscitation; suggest the use of dobutamine as a first-line inotrope; recommend administering vasopressors through a central venous line and suggest administering vasopressors and inotropes via a central venous line using a syringe or infusion pump when available.ConclusionRecommendations for haemodynamic assessment and support in sepsis and septic shock in resource-limited settings have been developed by a task force of six international experts in critical care medicine with extensive practical experience in resource-limited settings.

Highlights

  • Recommendations for care in patients with sepsis or septic shock are largely based on evidence originating from resource-rich settings.[1]

  • As costs and the availability of, and indications for, intravenous fluids can be different in resource-limited settings, certain types and amounts of intravenous fluid should be used during fluid resuscitation, and the proper timing of intravenous fluid treatment for sepsis and septic shock in resource-limited intensive care units (ICUs) is essential

  • Recommendation: We suggest using capillary refill time, skin mottling scores and, if affordable, skin temperature gradients to assess the adequacy of tissue perfusion in paediatric and adult sepsis and septic shock, either alone or in combination (UG)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recommendations for care in patients with sepsis or septic shock are largely based on evidence originating from resource-rich settings.[1]. A task force of the Global Intensive Care Working Group of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) wished to answer five practical questions regarding haemodynamic assessment and support in sepsis and septic shock in resource-limited settings. As costs and the availability of, and indications for, intravenous fluids can be different in resource-limited settings, certain types and amounts of intravenous fluid should be used during fluid resuscitation, and the proper timing of intravenous fluid treatment for sepsis and septic shock in resource-limited intensive care units (ICUs) is essential. Recommendations for haemodynamic assessment and support in sepsis and septic shock in resource-limited settings are largely lacking

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call