Abstract
Perceptions of others’ work-family conflict (WFC) have typically been studied as a top-down phenomenon grounded in gender role theory. This work has consistently revealed negative career consequences for followers whom leaders judge to have higher WFC, particularly female followers. However, we know less about the conditions under which those lower in organizational hierarchies (e.g., followers) notice and respond to leaders’ WFC, if these perceptions might be stronger for male leaders, and if these perceptions predict behavioral outcomes. Integrating insights from expectancy violation and social exchange theories, we propose that followers perceive more leader WFC when leaders work longer hours, have more family ties (i.e., a partner and young children), and are male. Furthermore, we propose that followers respond to male leaders’ WFC positively—with extra effort at work—because family care expectations are traditionally lower for fathers than for mothers, and higher WFC for fathers is a positively violated gender stereotype. Results from a field study and two experiments largely support our predictions. This research highlights a new form of “fatherhood bonus” wherein leaders’ ostensibly negative state–WFC–elicits positive behavioral effects in the form of extra effort from their followers/lower-level evaluators, particularly for male leaders.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.