Abstract

In earlier work, the neuronal primary current was expressed via the Helmholtz decomposition in terms of its irrotational part characterised by a scalar function and its solenoidal part characterised by a vectorial function. Furthermore, it was shown that EEG data is affected only by the irrotational part of the current, whereas MEG data is affected by two scalar functions, namely the irrotational component and the radial part of the solenoidal vectorial function. Here, we focus on the numerical implementation of this approach on the three-layer ellipsoidal model. The parametrization of the unknown functions in terms of ellipsoidal harmonics implicitly regularizes the highly ill-posed associated inverse problems. However, despite the above parametrization of these two unknown functions in terms of ellipsoidal harmonics, the inversion matrices are highly ill-conditioned for both EEG and MEG. In order to bypass this problem, we propose an alternative approach to the inversion problem. This involves revisiting the general inversion formulas presented earlier by one of the authors and expressing them as surface integrals. By choosing a suitable parametrization for the relevant unknown functions, these surface integrals can be evaluated using a method for numerical quadrature over smooth, closed surfaces. The method uses local radial basis function interpolation for generating quadrature weights for any given node set. This gives rise to a stable linear system of equations suitable for inversion and reconstruction purposes. We illustrate the effectiveness of our approach by presenting simple reconstructions for both EEG and MEG in a setting where data are contaminated with Gaussian white noise of signal to noise ratio (SNR) of 20 dB.

Highlights

  • The medical significance of Electro–Magneto-encephalography, EEG-MEG, is well established, see for examples [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]

  • In earlier work, the neuronal primary current was expressed via the Helmholtz decomposition in terms of its irrotational part characterised by a scalar function and its solenoidal part characterised by a vectorial function

  • The primary disadvantage for determining brain activity with EEG or MEG is the highly ill-posed nature of the associated spatial inverse problems: different electric currents can yield identical electric potentials measured in EEG, as well as identical magnetic fluxes measured in MEG

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The medical significance of Electro–Magneto-encephalography, EEG-MEG, is well established, see for examples [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. The solenoidal part of the current, which is characterized by the vectorial function A(τ ), does not affect the electric potential and only the radial component of A(τ ) affects the magnetic flux in Ωe It was shown in [11] that in the case of spherical and ellipsoidal geometries, Ψ(τ ) affects the electric potential on the scalp only through its value as well as the value of ∇Ψ on the surface Sc of the cerebral cortex.

Head model
Formulae for a current with three-dimensional support
Ellipsoidal geometry
Ellipsoid coordinates and separation of variables
The Lamé equation and its solutions
Ellipsoidal harmonics
Measurement equations for the three layer ellipsoidal head model
Estimating the geometry dependent coefficients Clm
Numerical results
The computation of Clm
Cross validation of Clm
EEG inversion matrix
EEG reconstructions
MEG inversion matrix
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.