Height restoration and sustainability using bilateral vertebral augmentation systems for vertebral compression fractures: a cadaveric study

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXTThe treatment of vertebral compression fractures using percutaneous augmentation is an effective method to reduce pain and decrease mortality rates. Surgical methods include vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty, and vertebral augmentation with implants. A previous study suggested that a titanium implantable vertebral augmentation device (TIVAD) produced superior height restoration compared to balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) but was based on a less clinically relevant biomechanical model. Moreover, the introduction of high pressure balloons and directional instruments may further aid in restoring height. PURPOSEThe objective was to evaluate three procedures (BKP, BKP w/ Kyphon Assist (KA; directional instruments), and TIVAD) used for percutaneous augmentation of vertebral fractures with respect to height restoration and sustainability post-operatively. STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGThis is an in vitro cadaver study performed in a laboratory setting. METHODSFive osteoporotic female human cadaver thoracolumbar spines (age: 63–77 years, T-score: -2.5 to -3.5, levels: T7–S1) were scanned using computed tomography and dissected into 30 two-functional spine units (2FSUs). Vertebral wedge compression fractures were created by reducing the anterior height of the vertebrae by 25% and holding the maximum displacement for 15 minutes. Post-fracture, surgery was performed on each 2FSU with a constant 100 N load. Surgeries included BKP, BKP w/ KA, or TIVAD (n=10 per treatment group). Post-surgery, cyclic loading was performed on each 2FSU for 10,000 cycles at 600 N (walking), followed by 5,000 cycles at 850 N (standing up/sitting down), and 5,000 cycles at 1250 N (lifting a 5-10kg weight from the floor). Fluoroscopic images were taken and analyzed at the initial, post-fracture, post-surgery, and post-loading timepoints. Anterior, central, and posterior heights, Beck Index, and angle between endplates were assessed. RESULTSNo difference in height restoration was observed among treatment groups (p=.72). Compared to the initial height, post-surgery anterior height was 96.3±8.7% for BKP, 94.0±10.0% for BKP w/ KA, and 95.3±5.8% for TIVAD. No difference in height sustainability in response to 600 N (p=.76) and 850 N (p=.20) load levels was observed among treatment groups. However, after 1250 N loading, anterior height decreased to 93.8±6.8% of the post-surgery height for BKP, 95.9±6.4% for BKP w/ KA, and 86.0±6.6% for TIVAD (p=.02). Specifically, the mean anterior height reduction between post-surgery and post-1250 N loading timepoints was lower for BKP w/ KA compared to TIVAD (p=.02), but not when comparing BKP to TIVAD (p=.07). No difference in Beck Index or angle between endplates was observed at any timepoint among the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONSThe present study, utilizing a clinically relevant biomechanical model, demonstrated equivalent height restoration post-surgery and at relatively lower-level cyclic loading using BKP, BKP w/ KA, and TIVAD, contrary to results from a previous study. Less anterior height reduction in response to high-level cyclic loading was observed in the BKP w/ KA group compared to TIVAD. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCEAll three treatments can restore height similarly after a vertebral compression fracture, which may lead to pain reduction and decreased mortality. BKP w/ KA may exhibit less height loss in higher-demand patients who engage in physical activities that involve increased weight resistance.