Abstract

The Neoproterozoic Heavitree Quartzite is widespread in the Amadeus Basin and has correlatives in all of the major central Australian intracratonic basins. The origin of the formation is enigmatic, not only because of its widespread sheet‐like distribution and uniformity of composition, but also because intense silicification makes facies studies difficult. Recently discovered exposures at the eastern end of the basin are relatively free of diagenetic quartz allowing a detailed study of sedimentary structures and an understanding of the depositional architecture of the formation. The formation, which consists largely of pale‐tan or white quartzose sandstone interbedded with rare laminated mudstone and conglomerate intervals, was deposited in at least four depositional sequences. The sheet‐like nature of the sandstone results from an abundant supply of sediments deposited in a high‐energy, open, shelf‐like environment on a regionally subsiding, low‐gradient ramp. Environmental settings switched both laterally and temporally between sand waves deposited by reversing tidal flow and higher velocity unidirectional currents involving dunes and plane beds. In the early stages of deposition, mud‐dominated, tidal‐flat environments alternated with higher energy, sand‐dominated, tidally influenced settings. However, in the later stages of deposition a major eustatic sea‐level fall moved base‐level basinwards, earlier sediments were reworked by streams to form a ravinement surface, gravel was carried well into the basin and fines largely disappeared from the environment. Gravel deposition was followed by a return to high‐energy, tidally influenced deposits involving large sand waves or dunes. Towards the top of the formation sand waves deposited by reversing tidal currents gradually decline and are eventually replaced by dunes deposited by unidirectional current flow. The transition to the shallow‐marine, anoxic rocks of the Bitter Springs Formation is gradational in response to increased accommodation in a ramp setting which lacked a clearly defined shelf break. The Heavitree Quartzite was probably deposited as a direct response to the events surrounding the assembly and breakup of Rodinia, in particular peneplanation during regional uplift in response to a rising mantle plume followed by broad regional subsidence as the plume decayed prior to the breakup of the supercontinent. The large supply of quartz sand resulted from peneplanation associated with the rising plume and the lack of soil‐stabilising vascular plants, an environmental setting with no modern analogue. The ultimate disposition of fines is not known but, given the environment of deposition, it is likely that they were removed during peneplanation and bypassed the sag basin completely.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call