Abstract

Simple SummaryCellular growth, particularly muscle hypertrophy, requires substantial energetics. In animals, proper substrate utilization is essential. Maximal growth is dependent on both carbohydrates and lipids being oxidized to provide as much energy as possible for protein syntheses, while amino acids must be spared from oxidation to provide an ample supply of proteogenic building blocks. However, maximal cellular growth is not a default metabolic state and is easily overridden by environmental factors such as heat stress (HS). HS has previously been hypothesized to increase metabolic rate, as is typical of a general stress response. Newer evidence, however, suggest that HS may limit energy production by inhibiting the use of lipids as a fuel source. HS metabolism instead depends on carbohydrates and even amino acids as energetic substrate, potentially limiting energy production. This study demonstrates that, contrary to current recommendations, HS reduces metabolic rate. Findings demonstrated a 38% reduction in relative energy expenditure (kcal/day/kg) due to HS. HS also caused a 33% increase in amino acid oxidation. A combination of decreased energy production and increased amino acid oxidation creates a metabolic state with severely limited growth potential which cannot be solved by simply increasing feed.Heat stress (HS) diminishes animal production, reducing muscle growth and increasing adiposity, especially in swine. Excess heat creates a metabolic phenotype with limited lipid oxidation that relies on aerobic and anaerobic glycolysis as a predominant means of energy production, potentially reducing metabolic rate. To evaluate the effects of HS on substrate utilization and energy expenditure, crossbred barrows (15.2 ± 2.4 kg) were acclimatized for 5 days (22 °C), then treated with 5 days of TN (thermal neutral, 22 °C, n = 8) or HS (35 °C, n = 8). Pigs were fed ad libitum and monitored for respiratory rate (RR) and rectal temperature. Daily energy expenditure (DEE) and respiratory exchange ratio (RER, CO2:O2) were evaluated fasted in an enclosed chamber through indirect calorimetry. Muscle biopsies were obtained from the longissimus dorsi pre/post. HS increased temperature (39.2 ± 0.1 vs. 39.6 ± 0.1 °C, p < 0.01) and RER (0.91 ± 0.02 vs. 1.02 ± 0.02 VCO2:VO2, p < 0.01), but decreased DEE/BW (68.8 ± 1.7 vs. 49.7 ± 4.8 kcal/day/kg, p < 0.01) relative to TN. Weight gain (p = 0.80) and feed intake (p = 0.84) did not differ between HS and TN groups. HS decreased muscle metabolic flexibility (~33%, p = 0.01), but increased leucine oxidation (~35%, p = 0.02) compared to baseline values. These data demonstrate that HS disrupts substrate regulation and energy expenditure in growing pigs.

Highlights

  • Heat stress (HS) presents a complex and comprehensive challenge to an organism’s metabolism

  • A time effect was detected for feed intake (p < 0.01) with further analysis revealing the TN group did experience a significant increase in feed intake (p = 0.02) form pre to post while the HS group only trended on a change (p = 0.07)

  • Consistent with this, the current study demonstrates a rise in resting energy expenditure (RER) due to HS, where post-HS values of 1.02 ± 0.02 VCO2/VO2 indicate that carbohydrates are the primary substrate of oxidation while capacity for fatty acid oxidation (FAO) is limited

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Heat stress (HS) presents a complex and comprehensive challenge to an organism’s metabolism. Increases in temperature can directly influence substrate preference in muscle tissue independent of hormonal changes. Unlike typical stress responses that are associated with increased energy expenditure and decreased respiratory quotient [5,6], HS acting independent of a hormonal response has the potential to dramatically limit energy production through reductions in lipolysis and lipid oxidation [2,3,4]. Muscle TRPV1 receptors are housed internally on the sarcolemma and, rather than peripherally signaling the sensation of heat, locally coordinate substrate selection through the activation of heat shock factors (HSFs) and subsequent expression of heat shock proteins (HSPs). The cellular response to heat suppresses lipolysis [9] and prioritizes lipid storage [10] while increasing cellular glucose uptake [11,12] and glycolysis [13]. Though changes in HSP expression are not typically detected in in vivo HS models, the metabolic effects persist [2,14]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call