Heat Pump Controls to Exploit the Energy Flexibility of Building Thermal Loads

Abstract

Smart controls for heat pumps are required to harness the full energy flexibility potential of building thermal loads. A literature review revealed that most strategies used for this purpose can be classified in two categories: simpler rule-based control (RBC), and model predictive control (MPC), a more complex strategy based on optimization and requiring a prior model of the systems. Both RBC and MPC can use external penalty signals to prompt their actions. The price of electricity is most often used for this purpose, leading to strategies of cost reduction. As an alternative penalty signal, a novel marginal CO2 emissions signals was also conceived. In this thesis, both an RBC and an MPC controllers were developed as supervisory controls for an air-to-water heat pump supplying the heating and cooling needs of a residential building type from the Mediterranean area of Spain. The RBC strategy modulates the temperature set-points, while the MPC strategy minimizes the overall summed penalties (costs or emissions) due to the heat pump use, while balancing with comfort constraints and a proper operation of the systems. The MPC controller in particular required the development of a simplified model of the building envelope and of the heat pump performance, both adjusted differently for heating or cooling. The MPC included several novelties, such as the mixed-integer formulation, the heat pump simplified model based on experimental data and the consideration of its computational delay. The developed controllers were then tested, firstly in an experimental “hardware-in-the-loop” setup, with a real heat pump installed in the laboratory facilities, and connected to thermal benches that emulated the loads from a building model. Implementing the control strategies on a real heat pump enabled to highlight some practical challenges such as model mismatch in the MPC, communication issues, interfacing and control conflicts with the heat pump local controller. Secondly, a simulation-only framework was developed to test other configurations of the controllers, with TRNSYS as the main dynamic building simulation tool, coupled with MATLAB for the MPC controller. In that case, the real heat pump was replaced by a detailed model which was specially developed for this purpose. It is based on static tests performed in the laboratory, and therefore reproduces the dynamic behavior of the heat pump with high fidelity. The results from experimental and simulation studies revealed the ability of both types of controllers to shift the building loads towards periods of cheaper or less CO2-emitting electricity, these two objectives being in fact contradictory. In the cases where the reference control presented a large margin for improvements, the RBC and MPC controllers performed equally and provided important savings: around 15% emissions savings in heating mode, and 30% cost savings in cooling mode. In the cases where the reference control already performed close to optimally, the RBC controller failed to provide improvements, while the MPC benefitted from its stronger optimization and prediction features, reaching 5% cost savings in heating mode and 10% emissions savings in cooling mode. The research carried out in this thesis covered many aspects of energy flexibility in buildings: creation of input penalty signals, graphical representation of flexibility, development of controllers, performance in realistic experimental setup, fitting of appropriate models and compared performance in heating and cooling. The development efforts and barriers hindering the deployment of MPC controllers at large scale for building climate control have additionally been discussed. The performance of the developed controllers was evidenced in the thesis, proving their potential for load-shifting incentivized by different penalty signals: they could become a strong asset to unlock demand-side flexibility and in fine, help integrating a larger share of RES in the grid.