Abstract
Previous studies have shown that the Hidden Local Symmetry (HLS) Model, supplied with appropriate symmetry breaking mechanisms, provides an Effective Lagrangian (BHLS) able to encompass a large number of processes within a unified framework. This allowed one to design a global fit procedure which provides a fair simultaneous description of the e^+ e^- annihilation into six final states (pi ^+pi ^-, pi ^0gamma , eta gamma , pi ^+pi ^-pi ^0, K^+K^-, K_L K_S), the dipion spectrum in the tau decay and some more light meson decay partial widths. In this paper, additional breaking schemes are defined which improve the BHLS working and extend its scope so as to absorb spacelike processes within a new framework ({hbox {BHLS}}_2). The phenomenology previously explored with BHLS is fully revisited in the {hbox {BHLS}}_2 context with special emphasis on the phi mass region using all available data samples. It is shown that {hbox {BHLS}}_2 addresses perfectly the close spacelike region covered by NA7 and Fermilab data; it is also shown that the recent lattice QCD (LQCD) information on the pion form factor are accurately predicted by the {hbox {BHLS}}_2 fit functions derived from fits to only annihilation data. The contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment a_mu ^{mathrm{th}} of these annihilation channels over the range of validity of {hbox {BHLS}}_2 (up to simeq 1.05 GeV) is updated within the new {hbox {BHLS}}_2 framework and shown to strongly reduce the former BHLS systematics. The uncertainty on a_mu ^{mathrm{th}}(sqrt{s}< 1.05 , hbox {GeV}) is much improved compared to standard approaches relying on direct integration methods of measured spectra. Using the {hbox {BHLS}}_2 results, the leading-order HVP contribution to the muon anomalous moment is a_mu ^{mathrm{HVP-LO}}= 686.65 pm 3.01 +(+1.16,-0.75)_{mathrm{syst}} in units of 10^{-10}. Using a conservative estimate for the light-by-light contribution, our evaluation for the muon anomalous magnetic moment is a_mu ^{mathrm{th}}=left[ 11,659,175.96 pm 4.17 +(+1.16,-0.75)_{mathrm{syst}}right] times 10^{-10}. The relationship between the dispersive and LQCD approaches to the rho ^0–gamma mixing is also discussed which may amount to a shift of delta a_mu [pi pi ]_{rho gamma }=+(3.10pm 0.31) times 10^{-10} at LO+NLO, presently treated as additional systematics. Taking also this shift into account, the difference a_mu ^{mathrm{th}}-a_mu ^{mathrm{BNL}} exhibits a significance not smaller than 3.8 sigma .
Highlights
The Standard Model is widely recognized as the theory which unifies the whole realm of weak, electromagnetic and strong interactions among quarks, leptons and the various gauge bosons
It is shown that BHLS2 addresses perfectly the close spacelike region covered by NA7 and Fermilab data; it is shown that the recent lattice QCD (LQCD) information on the pion form factor are accurately predicted by the BHLS2 fit functions derived from fits to only annihilation data
Lellouch for having drawn our attention to this paper. This indicates that the LQCD parametrization [110] is in fair agreement with the BHLS2 fit function Fπ (s < 0) much beyond the expected HPQCD range of validity and validated by the DESY data points [99,100]; Fig. 8 clearly shows that the agreement between HPQCD [110] and BHLS2 extends to the prediction, shown in this figure by the green curve, derived when fitting with discarding the spacelike data
Summary
The Standard Model is widely recognized as the (gauge) theory which unifies the whole realm of weak, electromagnetic and strong interactions among quarks, leptons and the various gauge bosons (gluons, photons, W ±, Z 0). The existing model-independent data for the π ± and K ± form factors are found to naturally accommodate our global framework, giving support to the low energy behavior predicted by BHLS2 for all meson form factors This fair agreement extends to the π ± form-factor data provided by several lattice QCD (LQCD) groups. 1.05 GeV) and estimate additional systematics possibly due to modeling effects and to observed tension among some data samples Complementing this piece by the non-HLS part of the HVP derived by more usual means, one gives our best evaluation of the full HVP and our estimate of the muon anomalous magnetic moment. Ignoring for the moment the weak sector to ease the discussion, the HLS Lagrangian is derived by replacing in Eq (2) the usual derivative by the covariant derivative:
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have