Abstract
SFAS 142 made two significant changes to goodwill accounting. First, firms are required to annually test goodwill for impairment. Second, firms are prohibited from systematically amortizing goodwill. In this study, I test whether each of these changes resulted in improved financial reporting, as predicted by the FASB. I find evidence that annual impairment testing improves financial reporting. However, I also find evidence that elimination of systematic amortization reduced the quality of financial reporting. As additional analysis, I demonstrate that a goodwill accounting system that allows both annual impairment testing and systematic amortization, while allowing firms the discretion to choose a firm-specific mix of each, provides the most value relevant goodwill accounting numbers.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
