Abstract

ABSTRACT Following the adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in Malaysia, the accounting for goodwill has changed from systematic amortisation to a method based solely on periodic impairment testing. The objective of the impairment test is to ensure that reported goodwill does not have carrying amount in excess of its recoverable amount. Nevertheless, many critics suggest that the new method may allow managements to engage in opportunistic earnings manipulation activities. In this study, we examine the question of whether goodwill is more value relevant after adoption of an IFRS in Malaysia. Using panel data of non-financial firms listed on the Bursa Malaysia over the period from 2002 to 2010, we find evidence that goodwill is not value relevant in either the pre-and post IFRS periods. These findings are in line with the opponents of the new standards, who claim that, the use Fair Value Accounting (FVA) in the reporting of goodwill increases the opportunities for managerial opportunisms. Therefore, the consequences FVA devoid of relevant information for shareholders. We conclude that the existence of an unfavorable environments in Malaysia impedes efficient implementation of the new impairment regime. Keywords Cash Generating Units, Fair value, Emerging Markets, Standard setters, MFRS 3, Value relevance

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.