Hand and finger, ultrasound‐guided, percutaneous core needle biopsies: A safe procedure with high diagnostic accuracy

Abstract

AbstractIntroduction/PurposeTo determine the diagnostic accuracy and complication rates of ultrasound‐guided, percutaneous core needle biopsies of soft tissue masses in the hand and fingers.MethodsReports from all ultrasound‐guided procedures between 21 May 2014 and 17 March 2022 were queried for keywords including “hand”, OR “finger”, AND “biopsy”. Patient demographics, lesion size and location, biopsy needle gauge and the number of cores obtained were recorded. The final pathology of the mass excision was then compared with the core needle biopsy (CNB) for each patient.ResultsSixty‐six records were reviewed, and 37 patients met inclusion criteria. Maximum lesion diameter averaged 1.45 cm with a range between 0.4 and 4.3 cm. The frequency of needle gauges used was 14G (14%), 16G (24%), 18G (38%), 20G (11%) and ‘not reported’ (14%). The mean number of tissue cores obtained was 2.9 (SD 1.2; range 1 to 6), excluding nine cases that reported ‘multiple’. The frequency of CNB diagnoses included tenosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT) at 30%, ganglion cyst at 11% and epidermal inclusion cyst at 5%. CNB was 100% sensitive in detecting the three (8%) malignancies. Of the 37 tumours biopsied, 16 were surgically excised. One angiomyoma was originally diagnosed as a haemangioma on CNB, but all other histologic results were concordant for a diagnostic accuracy of 97%.DiscussionSmall soft tissue masses in the hands and fingers, even those less than 1 cm, are often amenable to ultrasound‐guided CNB. Performance under image guidance facilitates retrieval of core specimens adquate for histologic diagnosis with relatively few passes using higher gauge needles.ConclusionOverall, ultrasound‐guided CNB of the hand and fingers is safe and highly accurate in diagnosing soft tissue tumours. The accuracy is unrelated to the needle's gauge, the number of passes and the size of the lesions.