Abstract

BackgroundBiopsy is a crucial step within the diagnostic cascade in patients with suspected bone or soft tissue sarcoma. Open biopsy is still considered the gold standard. However, recent literature suggests similar results for percutaneous biopsy techniques. Therefore, the aim of this retrospective analysis was to compare open and percutaneous core needle biopsy (CNB) regarding their accuracy in diagnosis of malignant musculoskeletal lesions.MethodsFrom January 2007 to December 2009, all patients with suspected malignant primary bone or soft tissue tumour undergoing a percutaneous CNB or open biopsy and a subsequent tumour resection at our department were identified and enrolled. Sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPV), negative predictive values (NPV) and diagnostic accuracy were calculated for both biopsy techniques and compared using Fisher’s exact test.ResultsA total of 77 patients were identified and enrolled in this study. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy were 100% for CNB in bone tumours. Sensitivity (95.5%), NPV (91.7%) and diagnostic accuracy (93.3%) for open biopsy in bone tumours showed slightly inferior results without statistical significance (p > 0.05). In soft tissue tumours favourable results were obtained in open biopsies compared to CNB with differences regarding sensitivity (100% vs. 81.8%, p = 0.5), NPV (100% vs. 50%, p = 0.09) and diagnostic accuracy (100% vs. 84.6%, p = 0,19) without statistical significance. The overall diagnostic accuracy was 92.9% for CNB and 98.0% for open biopsy (p = 0.55). A specific diagnosis could be obtained in 84.2% and 93.9%, respectively (p = 0.34).ConclusionIn our study we found moderately inferior results for the percutaneous biopsy technique compared to open biopsy in soft tissue tumours whereas almost equal results were obtained for both biopsy techniques for bone tumours. Thus, CNB is a safe, minimal invasive and cost-effective technique for diagnosing bony lesions. In soft tissue masses, the indication for percutaneous core needle biopsy needs to be made carefully by an experienced orthopaedic oncologist with respect to the suspected entity, size of necrosis and location of the lesion to avoid incorrect or deficient results.

Highlights

  • Biopsy is a crucial step within the diagnostic cascade in patients with suspected bone or soft tissue sarcoma

  • A total sensitivity of 96.9% was determined for open biopsy and 88.8% for core needle biopsy (CNB) (P = 0.28)

  • Differences in favour of open biopsy were identified for negative predictive values (NPV) (94.1% vs. 83.3%, P = 0.55) and diagnostic accuracy (92.9% vs. 98.0%, P = 0.55)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Biopsy is a crucial step within the diagnostic cascade in patients with suspected bone or soft tissue sarcoma. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to compare open and percutaneous core needle biopsy (CNB) regarding their accuracy in diagnosis of malignant musculoskeletal lesions. According to the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines, patients with suspected bone or soft tissue sarcoma have to be transferred to dedicated centres for diagnostic workup and integrated therapy. An assessment consisting of clinical history and examination, imaging and tissue biopsy is recommended [3]. In this context, biopsy in particular is a crucial step providing the basis for any further therapeutic strategy [4]. Biopsy might be omitted only in the case of clinically and radiologically unambiguous benign lesions [5]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call