Abstract

Migration phenology is largely determined by how animals respond to seasonal changes in environmental conditions. Our perception of the relationship between migratory behavior and environmental cues can vary depending on the spatial scale at which these interactions are measured. Understanding the behavioral mechanisms behind population‐scale movements requires knowledge of how individuals respond to local cues. We show how time‐to‐event models can be used to predict what factors are associated with the timing of an individual's migratory behavior using data from GPS collared polar bears (Ursus maritimus) that move seasonally between sea ice and terrestrial habitats. We found the concentration of sea ice that bears experience at a local level, along with the duration of exposure to these conditions, was most associated with individual migration timing. Our results corroborate studies that assume thresholds of >50% sea ice concentration are necessary for suitable polar bear habitat; however, continued periods (e.g., days to weeks) of exposure to suboptimal ice concentrations during seasonal melting were required before the proportion of bears migrating to land increased substantially. Time‐to‐event models are advantageous for examining individual movement patterns because they account for the idea that animals make decisions based on an accumulation of knowledge from the landscapes they move through and not simply the environment they are exposed to at the time of a decision. Understanding the migration behavior of polar bears moving between terrestrial and marine habitat, at multiple spatiotemporal scales, will be a major aspect of quantifying observed and potential demographic responses to climate‐induced environmental changes.

Highlights

  • Variation in animal distribution is largely a consequence of how species respond to temporal distributions of key resources

  • We found that sea ice concentration was the main factor affecting the timing of migration of individual bears from sea ice to land

  • To some degree, assumptions that a landscape-scale threshold of >50% sea ice concentration is necessary for polar bear habitat (i.e., Schliebe et al 2008; Durner et al 2009; Gleason and Rode 2009; Hunter et al 2010; Regehr et al 2010)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Variation in animal distribution is largely a consequence of how species respond to temporal distributions of key resources. Quantifying how and when animal populations respond to seasonal environmental shifts or long-term habitat change often involves measurements of interacting factors over large geographic areas or landscapes (Stenseth et al 2002; Parmesan et al 2005; Hone and Clutton-Brock 2007). Baseline knowledge of landscape-scale ecological relationships can be useful for assessing implications of global or regional environmental change in relation to population viability and distribution (Thomas et al 2004; Austin and Rehfisch 2005; Van De Pol et al 2010).

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call