Abstract
Simple SummaryThe Wolong National Nature Reserve in Sichuan province covers a unique mountainous ecosystem located on the eastern border of the Tibetan Plateau in China. We applied a popular non-invasive observational method, i.e., infrared-triggered camera trapping, to gain thousands of photographs of wildlife to monitor biodiversity over three years. Combined with data on the local abiotic factors, our integrative statistical analysis identified the key environmental drivers, i.e., temperature and vegetation, affecting the distribution and abundance of mammals and birds in the reserve. All species were classified into three main types by their tolerance of or fondness for different environmental conditions. The detectability of each species by camera trapping was quantified and ranked to provide insights on each species’ relative abundance in the area.The high-altitude ecosystem of the Tibetan Plateau in China is a biodiversity hotspot that provides unique habitats for endemic and relict species along an altitudinal gradient at the eastern edge. Acquiring biodiversity information in this area, where the average altitude is over 4000 m, has been difficult but has been aided by recent developments in non-invasive technology, including infrared-triggered camera trapping. We used camera trapping to acquire a substantial number of photographic wildlife records in Wolong National Nature Reserve, Sichuan, China, from 2013 to 2016. We collected information of the habitat surrounding the observation sites, resulting in a dataset covering 37 species and 12 environmental factors. We performed a multivariate statistical analysis to discern the dominant environmental factors and cluster the mammals and birds of the ecosystem in order to examine environmental factors contributing to the species’ relative abundance. Species were generalized into three main types, i.e., cold-resistant, phyllophilic, and thermophilic, according to the identified key environmental drivers (i.e., temperature and vegetation) for their abundances. The mammal species with the highest relative abundance were bharal (Pseudois nayaur), Moupin pika (Ochotona thibetana), and Himalayan marmot (Marmota himalayana). The bird species with highest relative abundance were snow partridge (Lerwa lerwa), plain mountain finch (Leucosticte nemoricola), Chinese monal (Lophophorus lhuysii), and alpine accentor (Prunella collaris).
Highlights
The main problems that constrain the efficacy of biodiversity conservation in China include habitat loss and fragmentation, overuse and environmental pollution
Species’ relative abundance (RA) and environmental factors were used for detrended correspondence canonical analysis (DCCA) to detect principal environmental factors and to cluster species [14]
The cameras recorded for 7056 days and we retrieved ~90,000 photos and ~30,000 video clips, including 2251 effective detections of wildlife, leading to the identification of 37 species (Figure 2)
Summary
The main problems that constrain the efficacy of biodiversity conservation in China include habitat loss and fragmentation, overuse and environmental pollution. Apart from habitat loss, another major challenge for the wildlife in China is climate change, especially in high-altitude mountainous areas where the limited vertical space reduces the flexibility of migration or emigration as a consequence [2,8]. Infrared-triggered camera trapping, a non-invasive and highly efficient observational technique, has been popular compared to conventional tools such as wireless telemetry collars [9,10] This technology has facilitated continuous observations of alpine wildlife activities in the southwestern mountains of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau [11,12]. The score of habitat type reflected comprehensive living conditions as an integrated indicator, while shrub or herbal coverage reflected how plants grew in and covered the survey site from a single aspect Based on these records, maximum activity temperature, minimum activity temperature, and average activity temperature were calculated for the subsequent analysis. The linear distance from the camera installation sites to the closest water source was measured in the projected map on the QGIS platform with the geographical coordinates of the camera installation sites
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
