Abstract

Recovery of an ecosystem following disturbance can be severely hampered or even shift altogether when a point disturbance exceeds a certain spatial threshold. Such scale-dependent dynamics may be caused by preemptive competition, but may also result from diminished self-facilitation due to weakened ecosystem engineering. Moreover, disturbance can facilitate colonization by engineering species that alter abiotic conditions in ways that exacerbate stress on the original species. Consequently, establishment of such counteracting engineers might reduce the spatial threshold for the disturbance, by effectively slowing recovery and increasing the risk for ecosystem shifts to alternative states. We tested these predictions in an intertidal mudflat characterized by a two-state mosaic of hummocks (humps exposed during low tide) dominated by the sediment-stabilizing seagrass Zostera noltii) and hollows (low-tide waterlogged depressions dominated by the bioturbating lugworm Arenicola marina). In contrast to expectations, seagrass recolonized both natural and experimental clearings via lateral expansion and seemed unaffected by both clearing size and lugworm addition. Near the end of the growth season, however, an additional disturbance (most likely waterfowl grazing and/or strong hydrodynamics) selectively impacted recolonizing seagrass in the largest (1 m2) clearings (regardless of lugworm addition), and in those medium (0.25 m2) clearings where lugworms had been added nearly five months earlier. Further analyses showed that the risk for the disturbance increased with hollow size, with a threshold of 0.24 m2. Hollows of that size were caused by seagrass removal alone in the largest clearings, and by a weaker seagrass removal effect exacerbated by lugworm bioturbation in the medium clearings. Consequently, a sufficiently large disturbance increased the vulnerability of recolonizing seagrass to additional disturbance by weakening seagrass engineering effects (sediment stabilization). Meanwhile, the counteracting ecosystem engineering (lugworm bioturbation) reduced that threshold size. Therefore, scale-dependent interactions between habitat-mediated facilitation, competition and disturbance seem to maintain the spatial two-state mosaic in this ecosystem.

Highlights

  • One of the most studied and debated issues in ecology is the relative importance of factors affecting how organisms and ecosystems respond to disturbance [1,2,3,4]

  • One factor which may have a fundamental impact is the size of point disturbances; following a disturbance that exceeds a threshold size, local processes often change, recovery slows down, and communities may even develop into alternative stable states [5]

  • Theory and observation suggests scale-dependent ecosystem shifts can be caused by increased abiotic stress on recolonizing individuals, when the removal of an ‘‘ecosystem engineering’’ species simultaneously removes the self-facilitation required for recovery

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the most studied and debated issues in ecology is the relative importance of factors affecting how organisms and ecosystems respond to disturbance [1,2,3,4]. One factor which may have a fundamental impact is the size of point disturbances; following a disturbance that exceeds a threshold size, local processes often change, recovery slows down, and communities may even develop into alternative stable states [5] Such scaledependent responses have typically been explained by weakened competitive exclusion from surrounding individuals, which increases the chance that previously inferior competitors can recruit into and dominate the center of disturbed areas [5,6,7]. Theory and observation suggests scale-dependent ecosystem shifts can be caused by increased abiotic stress on recolonizing individuals, when the removal of an ‘‘ecosystem engineering’’ species simultaneously removes the self-facilitation required for recovery. The ecosystem shift (from a state with the engineer to a state without the engineer) will occur even if competitors do not colonize, because increased stress is the factor preventing recovery

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call