Habitat loss and fragmentation increase realized predator–prey body size ratios

Abstract

Abstract In the absence of predators, habitat fragmentation favours large body sizes to facilitate gap crossing. The size of primary consumers is, however, also shaped by top‐down effects as predators select prey of a certain size. Therefore, higher trophic levels should be taken into consideration when studying the effect of habitat loss and fragmentation on size distributions of herbivores. We built a model to study the effect of habitat loss and fragmentation within a tri‐trophic food chain. Body size is directly linked to movement capacity and metabolic processes and considered as a master trait under selection. We show that basal resources accumulate locally if a predator causes top‐down control of the herbivore. Due to this increasing spatiotemporal variability in resource availability, larger herbivores are selected than in scenarios without predator as they are able to move further. As predators cause herbivores to be intrinsically much larger than the optimal sizes selected by habitat fragmentation in the absence of predators, habitat fragmentation is no longer a significant driver of herbivore size. However, there is selection for increased predator size with habitat fragmentation as herbivores become less abundant, hence favouring gap‐crossing ability of the predator. Since herbivore and predator body size respond differently to habitat loss and fragmentation, realized predator–herbivore body size ratios increase along this fragmentation gradient. Our model demonstrates how feedbacks between the abundance, body size and mobility of predators and prey ultimately determine body size distributions in food webs. These new insights shed light on the impact of habitat destruction and fragmentation on overall food web structure. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.