Abstract

A critical component of animal conservation in a changing world is an understanding of the physiological resilience of animals to different conditions. In many aquatic animals, hypoxia (low environmental oxygen levels) is a regular occurrence, but the likelihood and severity of hypoxia varies across habitats. Fast-flowing, stream-like habitats are never hypoxic, so long as flow is maintained. Do animals from such habitats retain the capacity to survive hypoxic conditions? We use aquatic frog tadpoles to test the effects of natural habitat on performance in hypoxia in an experimental framework, finding that stream-living tadpoles have reduced performance in hypoxia. Tadpoles also vary in lung presence, with some species able to breathe air during hypoxia. We found that among lunged tadpoles, air-breathing rates increase in hypoxia in pond-living species but not stream-living species. Lung presence was also found to influence hypoxia performance, as lungless, stream-living tadpoles were found to be especially vulnerable to hypoxia, while pond-living, lungless tadpoles appeared largely resilient to hypoxia. We consider the ramifications of our findings on conservation outlooks and strategies for frogs and their tadpoles, suggesting that stream-living tadpoles, and especially lungless, stream-living tadpoles, may be particularly at risk to factors that reduce stream flow. Thus, a primary goal for conservation and management of species with stream-living tadpoles should be the maintenance of year-round streamflow, which oxygenates waters and prevents hypoxia.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call