Defensins of the stable fly (Stomoxys Calcitrans) have developmental-specific regulation and evolve at different rates.

Abstract

Organisms produce antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) either in response to infection (induced) or continuously (constitutively) to combat microbes encountered during normal trophic activities and/or through pathogenic infections. The expression of AMPs is tightly regulated often with specificity to particular tissues or developmental stages. As a result, AMPs face varying selective pressures based on the microbes the organism's tissue or developmental stage encounters. Here, we analyzed the evolution and developmental-specific expression of Defensins, which are ancient AMPs in insects, in the stable fly (Stomoxys calcitrans). Stable fly larvae inhibit microbe-rich environments, whereas adult flies, as blood-feeders, experience comparatively fewer encounters with diverse microbial communities. Using existing RNA-seq datasets, we identified six Defensins that were only expressed in larvae (larval Defensins) and five that were not expressed in larvae (non-larval Defensins). Each of the non-larval Defensins was expressed in at least one adult tissue sample. Half of the larval Defensins were induced by mating or feeding in adults, and all three of the induced Defensins were located downstream of canonical binding sites for an Imd transcription factor involved in the highly conserved NF-κB signaling that regulates induction of AMPs. The larval and non-larval Defensins were located in distinct genomic regions, and the amino acid sequences of the larval Defensins formed a monophyletic clade. There were more amino acid substitutions across non-larval Defensins, with multiple genes losing a highly conserved furin cleavage site thought to be required for the removal of the amino terminus from the mature Defensin domain. However, larval Defensins had a higher proportion of radical amino acid substitutions, altering amino acid size and polarity. Our results reveal insights into the developmental stage-specific regulation of AMPs, and they suggest different regulatory regimes impose unique selection pressures on AMPs, possibly as a result of variation in exposure to microbial communities across development.