Abstract

Abstract Two coordination polymers, {[(NiL allyl ) 2 (BuTC)]∙2DEF∙2H 2 O} ( 1 ) and {[(NiL allyl ) 2 (BuTC)]∙3H 2 O} ( 2 ), ([NiL allyl ](ClO 4 ) 2 = [Ni(C 14 H 30 N 6 )](ClO 4 ) 2 , H 4 BuTC = 1,2,3,4-butanetetracarboxylic acid, DEF = N,N′ -diethylformamide), were prepared by the self-assembly of [NiL allyl ](ClO 4 ) 2 and H 4 BuTC in DEF/H 2 O and acetonitrile/H 2 O, respectively. Single crystal X-ray diffraction and X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) results revealed that 1 and 2 have two-dimensional layered structures, and the layers were stacked infinitely. Further, guest molecules were intercalated between the layers. Since both of coordination polymers 1 and 2 were constructed from the same building blocks, the structure of each layer was identical. However, depending on the size and the nature of guest molecules, layer packing and the interlayer distances were different for each coordination polymer. Interestingly, due to the instability of DEF guest molecules intercalated in the coordination polymer 1 , these guest molecules could be easily liberated from the host, consequently resulting in the same XRPD pattern as that of 2 with slightly different relative intensities. Dried compounds of 1 and 2 ( 1′ and 2′ , respectively) also showed the same result as evidenced by the XRPD patterns. The similar but non-identical XRPD patterns were revealed that the dried structure 1′ had the same interlayer distance and the same intralayer structure as 2 and 2′ did, whereas its layer packing remained the same as that of 1 . This subtle structural difference of 1′ and 2′ resulted in their different CO 2 uptake behaviors at 195 K.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call