Abstract

Aim To assess the growth trajectory of preterm small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonates compared to preterm non-small-for-gestational age neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit and special care nursery. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a large tertiary hospital in Victoria, Australia, examining neonates ≤34 weeks’ gestation admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit or special care nursery between 2013 and 2017. We categorized neonates according to their birth weight centile: <10th centile (small-for-gestational age) and ≥10th centile (non-small-for-gestational age). Growth trajectory was tracked based on serial weights obtained in the neonatal intensive care unit and special care nursery, using z-scores derived from Fenton preterm growth charts. Our primary outcome was the change in weight z-score from birth to discharge from neonatal intensive care unit or special care nursery. Results Of the 910 babies included, 88 were small-for-gestational age and 822 were appropriate-for gestational age. Both groups had a reduction in their weight z-score; however, SGA babies had a significantly smaller reduction (–0.62 SD compared to −0.85 SD, p < .0001). Small-for-gestational-age neonates were four times more likely to experience an increase in their weight z-score across their admission compared to neonates who were not small-for-gestational age (OR 4.04, 95% CI 2.23–7.48, p < .0001). Small-for-gestational-age neonates had an increased median length of stay, increased incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis but a reduced incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage. Conclusions Preterm SGA babies experience a smaller reduction in their weight trajectory compared to their appropriately grown counterparts in the neonatal intensive care unit or special care nursery.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call