Abstract
Humans can estimate numerosities–such as the number sheep in a flock–without deliberate counting. A number of biases have been identified in these estimates, which seem primarily rooted in the spatial organization of objects (grouping, symmetry, etc). Most previous studies on the number sense used static stimuli with extremely brief exposure times. However, outside the laboratory, visual scenes are often dynamic and freely viewed for prolonged durations (e.g., a flock of moving sheep). The purpose of the present study is to examine grouping-induced numerosity biases in stimuli that more closely mimic these conditions. To this end, we designed two experiments with limited-dot-lifetime displays (LDDs), in which each dot is visible for a brief period of time and replaced by a new dot elsewhere after its disappearance. The dynamic nature of LDDs prevents subjects from counting even when they are free-viewing a stimulus under prolonged presentation. Subjects estimated the number of dots in arrays that were presented either as a single group or were segregated into two groups by spatial clustering, dot size, dot color, or dot motion. Grouping by color and motion reduced perceived numerosity compared to viewing them as a single group. Moreover, the grouping effect sizes between these two features were correlated, which suggests that the effects may share a common, feature-invariant mechanism. Finally, we find that dot size and total stimulus area directly affect perceived numerosity, which makes it difficult to draw reliable conclusions about grouping effects induced by spatial clustering and dot size. Our results provide new insights into biases in numerosity estimation and they demonstrate that the use of LDDs is an effective method to study the human number sense under prolonged viewing.
Highlights
Humans can estimate the quantity of a set of objects without explicitly counting them
With “feature-driven effects”, we refer to differences in perceived numerosity that occur due to a feature difference between two conditions. These effects will be examined by comparing the one-group baseline condition–in which the test stimulus had the same visual properties as the response array (Fig 2B, top left)–with the one-group conditions in which the test stimulus differed from the response array in dot size, dot color, or dot motion
An increase in the response array area decreases the point of subjective equality with the test array, which means that the larger the area of an array, the larger the perceived number of dots
Summary
Humans can estimate the quantity of a set of objects without explicitly counting them. Several studies have found evidence in favor of Jacob’s hypothesis that perceived numerosity increases with the number of groups [5,6], but at least one other study has found an opposite effect [7] Another class of studies has examined effects of spatial regularity and found that, in general, regularly spaced items are perceived as more numerous than randomly arranged, more clustered items [4,8,9,10,11]. Besides these effects of spatial arrangement, several studies have found that perceived numerosity depends on the size of the individual objects, with mixed results: some of these studies report that larger elements are perceived as more numerous than smaller ones [20,21,22,23], while others report the opposite effect [4,24,25,26,27,28]
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have