Abstract

Abstract We study GL 2 ⁡ ( F ) {\operatorname{GL}_{2}(F)} -invariant periods on representations of GL 2 ⁡ ( A ) {\operatorname{GL}_{2}(A)} , where F is a non-archimedean local field and A / F {A/F} a product of field extensions of total degree 3. For irreducible representations, a theorem of Prasad shows that the space of such periods has dimension ⩽ 1 {\leqslant 1} , and is non-zero when a certain ε-factor condition holds. We give an extension of this result to a certain class of reducible representations (of Whittaker type), extending results of Harris–Scholl when A is the split algebra F × F × F {F\times F\times F} .

Highlights

  • One of the central problems in the theory of smooth representations of reductive groups over non-archimedean local fields is to determine when a representation of a group G admits a linear functional invariant under a closed subgroup H.The Gross–Prasad conjectures [5] give a very precise and elegant description of when such periods exist, for many natural pairs (G, H), in terms of ε-factors

  • We study GL2(F)-invariant periods on representations of GL2(A), where F is a non-archimedean local field and A/F a product of field extensions of total degree 3

  • We give an extension of this result to a certain class of reducible representations, extending results of Harris–Scholl when A is the split algebra F × F × F

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the central problems in the theory of smooth representations of reductive groups over non-archimedean local fields is to determine when a representation of a group G admits a linear functional invariant under a closed subgroup H (an H-invariant period). The ε-factor is still well-defined for all such L-packets, the conjecture formulated in [4] only applies when the L-parameters satisfy an additional “relevance” condition, raising the natural question of whether the ε-factors for non-relevant L-packets have any significance in terms of invariant periods. In this short note, we describe some computations of branching laws in the following simple case: G is GL2(A), where A/F is a cubic étale algebra, and H is the subgroup GL2(F). This is the analogue for quadratic Hilbert modular forms of the result proved in [7] for Beilinson’s elements attached to the Rankin convolution of two modular forms

Epsilon-factors
The generic Langlands correspondence for GL2
Statement of the theorem
Relation to results of Mœglin–Waldspurger
Split triple products
Quadratic fields
Cubic fields
An application to Euler systems
Adelic representations
Hilbert modular forms
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call