Abstract

The turbulence generated by wind shear is described at grey-zone resolutions using a theoretical neutral boundary layer based on atmospheric conditions constructed from measurements from the CASES-99 field campaign. Six-metre-resolution large-eddy simulations (LES) are performed to access the “true” resolved turbulence for two cases, corresponding to a forcing of the boundary layer by zonal geostrophic wind speeds of 10,text {m},text {s}^{-1} and 20,text {m},text {s}^{-1}. The LES fields are subject to a coarse-graining procedure in order to compute turbulence diagnostics in the grey zone, with the robustness and weakness of various averaging procedures tested, for which simple top-hat averaging is found to be both suitable and accurate. In addition, the “true” resolved and subgrid-scale fluxes, variances, turbulent kinetic energy and production terms are quantified on various scales. The grey zone of turbulence is defined as the range of scales where 10–90% of turbulence is resolved, which here ranges from resolutions of 25–800,hbox {m} (0.03<Delta x/h<1, where Delta x is the horizontal resolution, and h is the boundary-layer height). The subgrid/resolved partitioning of the variances of the velocity components depends on the geostrophic wind speed, which is not the case for the momentum-flux partitioning. Dynamic production terms show that fine-scale turbulence is isotropic (Delta x/h<0.03) and is quasi one-directional, oriented in the direction of the geostrophic wind vector at the mesoscale (Delta x/h>1). The turbulence parametrizations, which are tested in the Méso-NH model by running simulations at resolutions from the LES scale to the mesoscale, fail to produce the correct turbulence regardless of resolution.

Highlights

  • The grey zone of turbulence is defined by Wyngaard (2004) as the range of scales where the resolution of the model ( x) is close to the size of the turbulent structures

  • The “true” resolved and subgrid parts of turbulence as a function of the filtered scale are determined, where it is assumed, as in Honnert et al (2011) for the convective boundary layer (CBL), that the ratio of the subgrid and total turbulence only depends on the value of x/h according to eRES( x) eTOT

  • The “true” total turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) eTOT is computed as the sum of the resolved plus subgrid-scale TKE (eRES(LES) and eSGS(LES)) of the large-eddy simulation and is independent of the model resolution according to eTOT = eRES(LES) + eSGS(LES) = eRES( x) + eSGS( x), (3)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The grey zone of turbulence is defined by Wyngaard (2004) as the range of scales where the resolution of the model ( x) is close to the size of the turbulent structures. At these resolutions, the turbulent boundary-layer structures are partly resolved and partly subgrid scale. R. Honnert layer (ABL) from large-eddy simulations (LES), and defined the grey zone of turbulence as the scale where both the inversion depth and the dissipation length scale are of similar magnitude. Parametrizations must be adapted to the grey zone of turbulence

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call