Greenpeace avoids GM debate

Abstract

Enhancing the debate between science and society is a key aim of the European Molecular Biology Organization. In particular, one of the objectives of EMBO Reports since its launch in July 2000 has been to increase informed debate through its discussion columns. Earlier this year, EMBO Reports wished to publish both sides of the debate on the use of genetically modified organisms, particularly in agriculture. Two activists from the environmental organization Greenpeace wrote, but later withdrew, an article criticizing the use of GM organisms. The withdrawal was sparked when the authors realized that a companion piece would also be published that would detail the scientific arguments for the use of such technology [Trewavas and Leaver (2001) EMBO Rep. 2, 455–459]. Greenpeace has frequently spoken out against the use of GM crops, and Trewavas and Leaver begin their article with a transcript of proceedings from the House of Lords in which Lord Melchett, Chairman of Greenpeace, states his objection to the technology not only at present but as a ‘permanent and definite and complete opposition based on a view that there will always be major uncertainties’. EMBO Reports is likely to continue the debate on GM foods and other topics of major public interest. The need for scientific debate on such issues with key relevance to the general public is quite clear, and it is unfortunate that both sides of this argument were not presented together. D.S.