Abstract

Wind energy is crucial in German energy and climate strategies as it substitutes carbon-intensive fossil fuels and achieves substantial greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions. However, wind energy deployment currently faces several problems: low expansion rates, wind turbines at the end of their service life, or the end of remuneration. Repowering is a vital strategy to overcome these problems. This study investigates future annual GHG payback times and emission savings of repowered wind turbines. In total, 96 repowering scenarios covering a broad range of climatological, technical, economic, and political factors affecting wind energy output in 2025–2049 were studied. The results indicate that due to more giant wind turbines and geographical restrictions, the amount of repowerable sites is reduced significantly. Consequently, in most scenarios, emission savings will dramatically diminish compared to current savings. Even in the best-case scenario, the highest emission savings’ growth is at 11%. The most meaningful drivers of GHG payback time and emission savings are wind turbine type, geographical restrictions, and GHG emissions. In contrast, climate change impact on the wind resource is only marginal. Although repowering alone is insufficient for achieving climate targets, it is a substantial part of the wind energy strategy. It could be improved by the synergies of different measures presented in this study. The results emphasize that a massive expansion of wind energy is required to establish it as a cornerstone of the future energy mix.

Highlights

  • Using wind data from climate models provided by the European branch of the international CORDEX initiative (EURO-CORDEX) and different scenarios regarding wind turbine types, geographical restrictions, and emission reductions, this study addresses the following questions: (1) Does global climate change affect the overall wind energy output, gas payback time (GPBT), and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission savings of wind turbines and their spatial variability in Germany? (2) Does nationwide repowering of the current wind turbine fleet suffice to increase the amount of wind energy production and GHG emission savings to reach the national climate targets? (3) Which measures can be taken to improve future GHG savings?

  • Since geographical restriction criterion (GRC)-S depends on H, it significantly reduces the authorized sites to 28.5–39.5%, depending on wind turbine types (WTTs)

  • The calculation of the payback times and emission savings was performed based on CORDEX climate model data for 2025–2049

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Burning fossil fuels for power generation is one of the main contributors to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions leading to environmental damage and additional climate change [1,2]. Power production is responsible for about 25% of the global GHG emissions [3]. The adverse effects of fossil-based power production are reinforced with the recent high, growing global energy demand [1,4]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call