Greedy Like Algorithms for the Traveling Salesman and Multidimensional Assignment Problems

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

Majority of chapters of this book show usefulness of greedy like algorithms for solving various combinatorial optimization problems. The aim of this chapter is to warn the reader that not always a greedy like approach is a good option and, in certain cases, it is a very bad option being sometimes among the worst possible options. Our message is not a discouragement from using greedy like algorithms altogether; we think that for every combinatorial optimization problem of importance, researchers and practitioners should simply investigate the appropriateness of greedy like algorithms and the existence of better alternatives to them (considering both quality of solution and running time). In many cases, especially when the running time must be very short, the conclusion may still be that the most practical of known approaches is a greedy like algorithm. The Traveling Salesman and Multidimensional Assignment Problems are optimization problems for which greedy like approaches are usually not very successful. We demonstrate this by providing both theoretical and experimental results on greedy like algorithms as well as on some other algorithms that produce (in theory and/or in experiments) much better results without spending significantly more time. There are some general theoretical results that indicate that there are, in fact, many combinatorial optimization problems for which greedy like algorithms are not the best option even among fast construction heuristics, see, e.g., [3, 5, 17]. We will not consider these general results in order to avoid most mathematical details that are not necessary for understanding the results of this chapter. For this reason we will not give proofs here apart from two simple proofs: that of Theorem 8 which shows that some instances on which the greedy algorithm fails are not exotic in a sense and that of Theorem 11 since Theorem 11 is a new result. It is not a trivial question whether a certain algorithm is greedy like or not. In the next section we define an independence system and give the classic definition of the greedy algorithm for such a system. We extend this definition to so-called greedy type algorithms that include such well-known algorithms as the Prim’s algorithm for the minimum spanning tree problem and the nearest neighbor algorithm for the traveling salesman problem. We use the term ‘greedy like’ in an informal way and we include in this class simple and fast construction heuristics that seem to us to be of greedy nature. O pe n A cc es s D at ab as e w w w .in te ch w eb .o rg