Abstract
The advantages of vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) have been acknowledged, particularly during the last decade. Furthermore, VANET-related issues have been addressed by different researchers. Forwarding information professionally in a VANET is considered a challenging task precisely at the intersections where forwarding the information turns out to be extremely problematic. To elucidate this problem, many researchers have established routing protocols. The improved greedy perimeter stateless routing protocol (IGPSR) has been suggested, in the direction of employing greedy-mode proceeding traditional transportation's streets as well as to employ intersection-method at the joints. In view of greedy mode, the selection of the following stage is as in GPSR. By contrast, in the mode at an intersection, we would expect the vehicle guidelines to govern the following stage. The recreated consequences expose the algorithm, which is anticipated to undeniably demonstrate its competency.
Highlights
With the growth of network technologies, driving tasks have turned out to be more puzzling when using innovative knowledge to identify road conditions, making it more essential to generate data from vehicle transmissions
An ad hoc system is a type of wireless network system that can change data between cars and create a vehicular ad hoc network (VANET) [1,2,3,4]
We briefly describe three GPSR algorithms, considering the greedy perimeter coordinator routing (GPCR) algorithm and GpsrJ+. e GPSR algorithm [5], which is considered a position-based routing algorithm, at a midway node forwards a container to a direct nearest place that is nearer to the target of the node. is is known as greedy forwarding
Summary
With the growth of network technologies, driving tasks have turned out to be more puzzling when using innovative knowledge to identify road conditions, making it more essential to generate data from vehicle transmissions. Various protocols have been recommended to organize transport networks between vehicles [4], a supplementary investigation is still needed to cultivate a competent routing protocol that can reduce or decrease the hop count in the spread of data and to dodge a wrong track under several circumstances such as at intersections. E confidentiality of VANET routing protocols can be classified as follows: first, geographical routing protocols [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13] that appoint the benefits of GPS obtain the vehicle spots where a message should be forwarded to reach the endpoint. E proposed routing protocol can be classified under the first category of geographical routing protocols and proceeds with the benefits of GPS making messages to be forwarded at nodes
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
