Abstract

This paper aims at investigating gravity load collapse behavior of extremely poor quality reinforced concrete columns under cyclic loading. Such columns were usually constructed by local people and may not be designed to meet any of the standards. It was found that their concrete strength may be as low as 5 MPa and the amount of longitudinal reinforcement may be lower than 1%. This type of column is deliberately defined as “nonengineered reinforced concrete column,” or NRCC. During earthquake, the gravity load collapse of the NRCC columns caused a large number of death tolls around the world. In this study, four columns as representative of existing NRCC were tested under cyclic loading. The compressive strength of concrete in order of 5 MPa was used to be representative of columns with poor quality concrete. Two axial load levels of 6 and 18 tons were used to study the influence of axial load level on maximum drift at gravity load collapse. To investigate the effect of bar types on drift capacity, 9 mm round bars were used in two specimens and 12 mm deformed bars were used for the rest of the specimens. The maximum drift before gravity load collapse was very dependent on the axial load level. The maximum drift of the specimens subjected to high axial load (18 tons) was extremely low at approximately 1.75% drifts. The use of deformed bars (associated with larger amount of longitudinal reinforcement) caused the damage to severely dissipate all over the height of the columns. Such damage caused columns to collapse at a lower drift compared to those using round bars. Finally, the plastic hinge model was used to predict the maximum drift of the low strength columns. It was found that the model overly underestimates the drift at gravity load collapse.

Highlights

  • Earthquake engineering research has been undertaken to better understanding structural behavior under severe earthquake

  • Four column specimens (12L-0.2, 12L0.6, 9L-0.2, and 9L-0.6) as representative of prototype columns with low strength concrete in order of 5 MPa were tested under cyclic loading

  • It is evident that the drift at axial load collapse of NRCC columns is significantly dependent on axial load level but slightly dependent on type of longitudinal reinforcement. e type of longitudinal reinforcements plays more important role on drift level only when the axial load level is low. e use of round bars in NRCC is recommended since it could lead to columns collapse under gravity load at larger drift compared to those using deformed bar

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Earthquake engineering research has been undertaken to better understanding structural behavior under severe earthquake. Most design methods and strengthening techniques developed in the past decades were found to be very effective and experimentally proved to be able to prevent the building collapse from strong earthquake [16]. If the findings from earthquake research and development could be practically applied, the number of death tolls from earthquake around the world should be significantly reduced. There are very limited numbers of research on seismic behavior of such structures under the earthquake. To economically and effectively retrofit these structures, the behavior of the structures under earthquake should be studied prior to develop a proper strengthening approach [24]. Erefore, in this study, the behavior of four column specimens as representative of nonengineered columns, or NRCC, was tested to investigate their seismic behavior. e gravity load-carrying mechanism and collapse behavior are of most interest. e test setup and test results will be discussed

Experimental Program
Crack Pattern Results
Lateral Load-Drift Ratio Responses
The Envelope Curves of All Specimens
Axial Displacement and Drift Ratio Relationship
Findings
Theoretical Model for Column Collapse
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call