Graves-Basedow ophthalmopathy surgical approaches: Open vs Endoscopic

Abstract

Graves-Basedow's disease (GBD) is an autoimmune pathology that affects the thyroid and is characterized by the presence of goiter, hyperthyroidism, ophthalmopathy, and dermopathy. Graves-Basedow ophthalmopathy (GBO) is a set of inflammatory and infiltrative alterations of the orbital tissue that affects 40–90% of subjects suffering from GBD. Our study aims to investigate the differences in the clinical outcomes of patients treated with two different techniques: the classic open and the more modern endoscopic. A retrospective clinical study was carried out from the year 2011 until the year 2020 to evaluate the clinical outcomes of two different surgical techniques for the treatment of GBO. Eighteen patients were given surgical indications, 12 males and 6 females aged between 37 and 69 years (average age 48.5 years), for a total of 36 orbits. From the year 2011 to the year 2014, all patients were treated with the open orbital decompression technique; from 2015 onwards, patients were subjected to orbital decompression with the endoscopic transnasal approach. Pre- and postoperative ophthalmometry, reduction of proptosis, and reduction of oculo-orbital index were compared for the two techniques. As evidenced by the statistical analysis carried out on the sample before and after surgical treatment, there is a statistically significant difference between ophthalmometry and the Oculo-Orbital Index (IOO) values; this indicates that surgical orbital decompression with two walls (floor and medial wall) is effective in reducing exophthalmos. The positive result is also confirmed by the reduction of proptosis, measured in millimeters, averaging 1.7 mm. In the analysis of data relating to the two different patient groups, treated respectively with endoscopic orbital decompression (Technique 1) and classical open orbital decompression (Technique 2), the results obtained show that there is no statistically significant difference between the results of the two techniques. Therefore, the choice of surgical approach is at the discretion of the surgeon. It is our opinion that orbital decompression with the endoscopic transnasal technique should be an absolute indication in all patients who have clinical and radiographic signs of involvement of the optic nerve at the orbital apex (crowded apex syndrome) thanks to the ability of this technique to add and decompress the optical channel at the apex. For all other patients with GBO, the endoscopic technique of orbital decompression can be indicated as a first-line surgical approach considering the absence of skin scars and the best aesthetic results.