Abstract

External orbital decompression, including medial wall, inferior wall, lateral wall and orbital fat decompression alone or in combination, has long been considered to be the standard treatment for thyroid related eye diseases. Deep lateral wall orbital decompression has better effect in the balance of eye position, correction of serious exophthalmos and severe oppression optic neuropathy. Recently, however, endoscopic orbital decompression is becoming increasingly popular with the development of endoscopic surgery technique in naso-orbit related diseases. Endoscopic orbital decompression has the advantages of avoiding an external incision scar. Nevertheless, the new method also has some disadvantages, for example, application limited to medial and inferior orbital wall orbital decompression, high incidence of esotropia, need for external lateral wall decompression and expensive cost for equipment. Both surgical approaches have advantages and disadvantages respectively for medial wall and inferior wall decompression. The operative result depends on the individualized surgical design and the experience of the surgeon rather than the choice of the surgical approach. As a result, the choice of the surgical approaches should be specifically based on the patient's conditions, patient's acceptance of the operation, experience of the surgeon and available resources. (Chin J Ophthalmol, 2018, 54: 484-487).

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.