Abstract
Capability to compare biological models is a crucial step needed in an analysis of complex organisms. Petri nets as a popular modelling technique, needs a possibility to determine the degree of structural similarities (e.g., comparison of metabolic or signaling pathways). However, existing comparison methods use matching invariants approach for establishing a degree of similarity, and because of that are vulnerable to the state explosion problem which may appear during calculation of a minimal invariants set. Its occurrence will block usage of existing methods. To find an alternative for this situation, we decided to adapt and tests in a Petri net environment a method based on finding a distribution of graphlets. First, we focused on adapting the original graphlets for notation of bipartite, directed graphs. As a result, 151 new graphlets with 592 orbits were created. The next step focused on evaluating a performance of the popular Graphlet Degree Distribution Agreement (GDDA) metric in the new environment. To do that, we decided to use randomly generated networks that share typical characteristics of biological models represented in Petri nets. Our results confirmed the usefulness of graphlets and GDDA in Petri net comparison and discovered its limitations.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
