Abstract
Our analysis of discourse conditions on Long Distance (LD) reflexives is based primarily on the taxonomy of logophoricity of Sells, who, like many authors, has argued that the notion of logophoricity plays a crucial role in understanding the felicity conditions on the use of LD reflexives. This chapter focuses on Sells's taxonomy that provides a useful tool for explaining the differences between the conditions on LD reflexives in Mandarin and Teochew. Using Sells's diagnostics for PIVOT, SOURCE, and SELF, the chapter demonstrates that Mandarin and Teochew differ with regard to which logophoric requirements apply in the dialect: In both Mandarin and Teochew, PIVOT requirements apply to the choice of antecedent for a LD reflexive. It shows that Mandarin and Teochew differ with regard to whether subcommanding antecedents are possible for LD reflexives. Keywords: logophoricity; Long Distance (LD) reflexives; Mandarin; Sells; Teochew
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
