Abstract

BackgroundThis research sought to determine the impact of explicit program-based development of skills associated with research and Evidence Based Practice (EBP) on the attitudes and sustained behaviours of graduates subsequently employed in clinics. Systematic reviews have shown that university teaching of EBP and research skills rarely result in transfer of commensurate attitudes and sustained behaviours of students to their subsequent studies or to employment. Studies have therefore called for detailed exploration of what may enable this transfer of knowledge and skills to attitudes and behaviours. In keeping with these calls, this paper presents a fine-grained qualitative study of graduates’ research skills and EBP in clinics with particular reference to pertinent attitudes, values and behaviours sustained, or further developed, one year after program completion.MethodsThe study revolved around employed graduates of a Bachelor of Oral Health (BOH) program, which used the Research Skill Development (RSD) framework to structure the explicit, coherent and cyclic development of the skills associated with research in multiple semesters of the degree. One year after their completion of the BOH program, semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine employed graduates, three from each of three consecutive cohorts, to gain their professional perspectives on their research skills and EBP developed at university and then used in clinics. While the pre-determined interview questions focused on employed graduates’ knowledge and skills, the attitudes and values around research skills and EBP emerged spontaneously.ResultsGraduates that were interviewed relayed in detail their attitudes and values associated with research skills and EBP when asked about their work in clinics, even though the affective elements were not specifically elicited. In the employment context, the positive affective aspects of the skills associated with research and EBP that graduates discussed were pronounced, and this contrasted with working graduates retrospective view of university research skills and EBP.ConclusionsThe richness of affective interaction with patients was a factor that enabled the interviewed graduates to transfer university knowledge and skills into attitudes and behaviours associated with EBP. We recommend similar fine-grained qualitative research to further develop constructs that enable quantification of the interplay of cognitive and affective facets in researching and EBP.

Highlights

  • This research sought to determine the impact of explicit program-based development of skills associated with research and Evidence Based Practice (EBP) on the attitudes and sustained behaviours of graduates subsequently employed in clinics

  • The first section addresses Question 1 and considers graduates’ retrospective look at the development of skills when they were previously students in university, and where they attribute this development to specific aspects of the Bachelor of Oral Health (BOH)

  • Graduates’ perspectives of the development of research skills and EBP in the BOH The first research question concerned the extent to which the graduates retrospectively attributed the development of their research skills to the explicit, designed features of the BOH

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This research sought to determine the impact of explicit program-based development of skills associated with research and Evidence Based Practice (EBP) on the attitudes and sustained behaviours of graduates subsequently employed in clinics. Health science programs strive to produce competent graduates who care for and about patients, are technically proficient, keep up with changes in knowledge and skills, and apply appropriate and reliable evidence to their practice. This is the drive to produce graduates who engage empathetically in Evidence-Based Practice (EBP). EBP is most commonly conceived of as drawing on an existing evidence base that was produced by researchers and used by clinicians [1] The emphasis in this perspective is that the producers of the evidence base are distinct from clinicians and the researchers have the epistemological power to recommend appropriate practice. This perspective sees clinicians as skilled consumers of published research, not with the capacity to generate original research [2]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call