Grading of urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract according to the World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology classification from 2004 is a valuable tool when considering whether a patient is suitable for endoscopic treatment

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to analyse the results regarding survival, recurrence and kidney preservation after endoscopic treatment for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) in a Norwegian hospital during the period from 2001 to 2012, and compare them with results reported in the literature. A further aim was to re-examine all initial histopathological specimens, and stratify primary results according to the World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology grading system of urothelial carcinoma from 2004. Materials and methods Forty-three patients were treated endoscopically with curative intent for UTUC during 2001–2012. Of these, 28 patients were candidates for nephroureterectomy (CNU) with an elective indication, while 15 were non-candidates for nephroureterectomy (NCNU). Analyses were performed separately for the CNU and NCNU groups. Results In the CNU group, the 5 year overall and disease-specific survival (OS and DSS) were 71% and 94%, respectively. In the NCNU group, the OS and DSS were 25% and 41%, respectively. Histopathological verification was available in 40 patients (93%), and re-examination showed 27 low-grade and 13 high-grade tumours. In patients with a low-grade tumour, the OS and DSS were 75% and 96%, respectively. In patients with a high-grade tumour, the OS and DSS were 23% and 39%, respectively. The 5 year kidney protection rate was 51% in the CNU group. The 5 year recurrence-free survival was 72%. Conclusions The endoscopic treatment of UTUC is feasible and safe in histopathologically verified low-grade tumours. The endoscopic treatment of high-grade tumours has poor results, and must be reserved for patients where nephroureterectomy is truly contraindicated.