Endoscopic Versus Laparoscopic Management of Noninvasive Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 20-Year Single Center Experience

Abstract

We compare the outcomes of endoscopic surgery to laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for the management of specifically noninvasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma. A retrospective database review identified consecutive patients with clinically noninvasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma who underwent endoscopic surgery (59, via ureteroscopic ablation or percutaneous resection) or laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (70) at a single center during 20 years (1991 to 2011). Overall survival, upper tract urothelial carcinoma specific survival, upper tract recurrence-free survival, intravesical recurrence-free survival, progression-free survival and renal unit survival were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods, with differences assessed using the log rank test. Median age and followup were 74.8 years and 50 months, respectively. Overall renal preservation in the endoscopic group was high (5-year renal unit survival 82.5%), although this came at a cost of high local recurrence (endoscopic surgery 5-year recurrence-free survival 49.3%, laparoscopic nephroureterectomy 100%, p <0.0001). For G1 upper tract urothelial carcinoma, endoscopic surgery 5-year disease specific survival (100%) was equivalent to that of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (100%). However, laparoscopic nephroureterectomy demonstrated superior disease specific survival to endoscopic surgery for G2 disease (91.7% vs 62.5%, p = 0.037) and superior progression-free survival for G3 disease (88.9% vs 55.6%, p = 0.033). For G1 upper tract urothelial carcinoma, endoscopic management can provide effective oncologic control and renal preservation. However, endoscopic management should not be considered for higher grade disease except in compelling imperative cases or in patients with poor life expectancy as oncologic outcomes are inferior to those of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy.