Abstract

The activities of Canadian mining companies operating abroad are often carried out under the banner of bringing badly-needed development and democracy to impoverished regions of the globe. Many of these projects, however, can often lead to increased poverty, conflict and insecurity in communities near the mines. There have also been egregious violations of human rights and grave environmental damages documented at Canadian mines worldwide. As a result, numerous countries in the Americas and beyond have seen burgeoning grassroots resistance movements rejecting the presence of Canadian extractive projects on their territory — movements that are almost invariably rejected as illegitimate by industry and Canadian government representatives, and almost always repressed by host country governments. Using critical discourse analysis and Foucault’s work on governmentality and biopower, this dissertation argues that discourses of democracy and development are increasingly being used to advance projects that are often fundamentally anti-democratic, destructive and exploitative, and that this represents a critical component of a nascent strategy by which neoliberal regimes of capital accumulation are advanced and legitimized today. Through discursive construction of Canadian mining regimes as purveyors of collective “development,” and strategic delegitimization of critics of Canadian mining activities as irrational, radical, dangerous threats to the betterment of society at large, support for the mine is galvanized and conflict surrounding the mine intensifies. This argument is grounded in exploration of three case studies: two open-pit gold/silver mines owned/operated by Goldcorp — their Honduran San Martín mine and their Guatemalan Marlin mine — and the politics of land claims near a non-functioning Guatemalan nickel mine previously owned by Canada’s Skye Resources and HudBay Minerals. Further evidence for this argument is offered in two accompanying documentary films that I have produced, exploring these particular case studies. In demonstrating how foot soldiers are being enlisted into an army that defends the interests of Canadian mining companies and the neoliberal economic order that they proliferate and prosper from — despite the fact that local benefits may be negligible and the harms incurred can be severe — this dissertation seeks to shed light upon a broader dynamic of resistance/counter-resistance playing out globally in areas beyond resource extraction.

Highlights

  • In his address to 34 heads of state at the sixth Summit of the Americas meeting held in Cartagena, Colombia in April 2012, Prime Minister Stephen Harper wasted no time in outlining his government’s priorities: he devoted his entire 10-minute address to extolling the virtues and expertise of Canadian mining companies and the various ways in which the Canadian government facilitates and supports the industry

  • After noting that 60 per cent of the world’s mining companies are listed on the TSX, with world-wide assets of nearly $200 billion and a contribution of $50 billion to Canada’s 2011 GDP, Harper announced plans to expand the already extensive Canadian mining investment found throughout the Americas, in an effort to, as he stated, “promote prosperity, democracy and security throughout our hemisphere... [and] to help local governments and communities implement related development projects for the benefit of people living near mines or other development activities.”12

  • There have been numerous egregious violations of human and environmental rights that have been documented at Canadian mines worldwide

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This incident is analyzed, and while personal, it is examined for the purpose of rooting out the systematic tendencies that this event reveals It is these tendencies that are important for the present work, and not the event itself, which is merely one amongst many possible ways of accessing and shedding light upon these worrying underlying patterns of behaviour, whereby the Canadian government consistently employs controversial, problematic, and at times illegal tactics in efforts of advancing the interests of Canadian mining companies operating abroad — despite well-founded allegations of environmental and human rights abuses that they have perpetrated — and silencing their critics. It comes as no surprise that development became a force so destructive to Third World cultures, ironically in the name of people’s interests.”

CHAPTER 1
CHAPTER 2 Open-Pit Metal Mining and the Politics of Legitimation
CHAPTER 3 Marching for Mining
CHAPTER 4 Branding Dissent and the Politics of Delegitimization
CHAPTER 6 Land Claims and the Erasure of History – Forced Evictions near El Estor
CHAPTER 7 Canada’s Support for Canadian Extractive Industries Abroad
Conclusion
Findings
A Public Letter To
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call