Abstract
This article investigates the distribution of power in Poland’s drug reimbursement policy in the early 2000s. We examine competing theoretical expectations suggested by neopluralism, historical institutionalism, corporate domination, and clique theory of the post-communist state, using data from a purposive sample of 109 semi-structured interviews and documentary sources. We have four concrete findings. First, we uncovered rapid growth in budgetary spending on expensive drugs for narrow groups of patients. Second, to achieve these favorable policy outcomes drug companies employed two prevalent methods of lobbying: informal persuasion of key members of local cliques and endorsements expressed by patient organizations acting as seemingly independent “third parties.” Third, medical experts were co-opted by multinational drug companies because they relied on these firms for scientific and financial resources that were crucial for their professional success. Finally, there was one-way social mobility from the state to the pharmaceutical sector, not the “revolving door” pattern familiar from advanced capitalist countries, with deleterious consequences for state capacity. Overall, the data best supported a combination of corporate domination and clique theory: drug reimbursement in Poland was dominated by Western multinationals in collaboration with domestically based cliques.
Highlights
This article investigates the distribution of power in Poland’s drug reimbursement policy in the early 2000s
We examine the extent of independence of medical experts from pharma by focusing on the Consultative Council, the key expert body within the Agency for Health Technology Assessment, given its role in legitimizing reimbursement decisions taken by political elites
We have argued that in the early 2000s the dominant actors in Poland’s reimbursement policymaking were multinational corporations collaborating with locally based cliques comprising political elites, bureaucrats, and medical experts
Summary
This article investigates the distribution of power in Poland’s drug reimbursement policy in the early 2000s. We uncovered rapid growth in budgetary spending on expensive drugs for narrow groups of patients To achieve these favorable policy outcomes drug companies employed two prevalent methods of lobbying: informal persuasion of key members of local cliques and endorsements expressed by patient organizations acting as seemingly independent “third parties.”. About the methods of policy influence employed by Western multinationals which came to dominate the most lucrative, technologically advanced sectors in the Polish liberal variety of post-communist capitalism, including financial services, telecommunications and information technologies, and pharmaceuticals (King 2007; Cichosz 2001). Like other Eastern Bloc countries, post-communist Poland inherited a Soviet-style Semashko healthcare system characterized by strict top-down bureaucratic management, with the Ministry of Health concentrating power over spending and regulation
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have