Gopal as a Sustainable Alternative: Chemical, Rheological, and Mechanical Insights

Abstract

The availability of petroleum asphalt, derived from non-renewable natural sources, is steadily declining in tandem with dwindling petroleum reserves. To mitigate the reliance on petroleum, alternative renewable natural sources are being explored for use as both modifiers and replacements for petroleum asphalt, particularly as binders in asphalt mixtures. The development of bio-asphalt represents a significant innovation aimed at reducing or even eliminating the dependence on petroleum as a source of asphalt. This paper examines the chemical, rheological, and mechanical properties of Gopal (Gondorukem Asphalt), a bio-asphalt derived from Gondorukem (gum rosin) and CPO (Crude Palm Oil). Two types of Gopal, Gopal-GEM130 and Gopal-GEG90, were analyzed using FTIR (Fourier Transform Infra-Red) and EDX (Energy Dispersive X-ray) tests, with Pen 60 petroleum asphalt serving as a control for comparison. The results indicate that the chemical groups of Gopal-GEG90 and Gopal-GEM130 share 86% similarity with those of Pen 60 petroleum asphalt. Compared to Pen 60, Gopal-GEM130 is less toxic and less alkaline, while Gopal-GEG90 is also less toxic but more alkaline. Rheologically, Gopal-GEG90 and Gopal-GEM130 fall within the same classification as Pen 60, based on the Pen 60 classification grade of asphalt. Gopal-GEG90 exhibits slightly better stripping resistance and lower aging resistance than Pen 60, whereas Gopal-GEM130 demonstrates significantly better stripping resistance but lower aging resistance. Performance-wise, both Gopal variants belong to the same performance grade (PG64S) as Pen 60 petroleum asphalt. However, Gopal-GEG90 has slightly better rutting resistance compared to Pen 60 but lower than Gopal-GEM130, and it ages faster with lower fatigue resistance. Conversely, Gopal-GEM130 has superior rutting resistance but lower fatigue resistance and ages faster than Pen 60 petroleum asphalt.