Gonadal hormones and sex differences in nonreproductive behaviors in rodents: Organizational and activational influences

Abstract

Sex differences in many nonreproductive behaviors have been described in rodents. Among the behaviors that are sexually dimorphic in the rat are activity, aggression, pain, and taste sensitivity, food intake and body weight regulation, the learning and retention of certain kinds of mazes, avoidance responses, taste aversion, and performance on certain schedules of reinforcement. Gonadal hormones seem to be responsible, in part, for sex differences in these behaviors, but their contribution varies greatly with the behavior in question. Frequently, these sexually dimorphic behaviors are influenced both by organizational and activational actions of sex hormones. In other instances (e.g., maze learning and the acquisition of shuttle-box avoidance responses) organizational influences predominate. And while there is no sexually dimorphic behavior surveyed that can be shown to be influenced only by activational effects, wheel-running activity is clearly more strongly subject to activational than to organizational effects of the gonadal hormones. In general, only rudimentary information exists regarding the temporal limits of the period in development when organizational influences on nonsexual behaviors occur. The suggestion can be made that organizational influences often occur outside of the critical period for differentiation of the neuroendocrine system regulating cyclic release of gonadotrophins. Even for behaviors where organizational effects usually occur during a roughly delimited period of development, data for other behavioral systems suggest that the time limits during which organizational effects can occur are not rigidly fixed. Very little information exists regarding biochemical or neural mechanisms by which organizational or activational effects on sexually dimorphic nonreproductive behaviors are expressed. It is important to recognize for many of the sexually dimorphic behaviors in the rat that differences between the sexes are neither large nor absolute. This is especially true of several kinds of learning situations where groups of males and females typically differ in average levels of performance. Ostensibly minor variations in test procedure can abolish or accentuate the average difference in performance between the sexes. We are a long way from an adequate understanding of what factors are important, but such information could be quite helpful in estimating whether sex differences in certain laboratory learning tasks have any adaptive significance. Sex differences in nonreproductive behaviors may be influenced by many factors other than hormonal status. This greatly complicates a comparative analysis, but such an analysis will ultimately be necessary. What limited data exist on rodents suggest that: (1) Sexually dimorphic responses in the rat are often not similarly differentiated in the hamster, the gerbil, or the mouse; and (2) major differences exist among rodent species in hormonal effects on such responses. Over the last decade it has become clear that the behavioral effects of deliberate neurological insult are not necessarily the same in male and female rats (or in one case, in rhesus monkeys). Sex differences in the behavioral effects of ventromedial hypothalamic, lateral hypothalamic, septal, and striatal lesions in the rat and of orbital prefrontal cortex lesions in the monkey have been described. While information regarding hormonal modulation of these differences in response to brain damage is very limited, available data suggest both organizational and activational effects of sex hormones may be involved. It is too early to tell where this line of research may ultimately lead, but rather striking sex differences in the incidence of certain neurological disorders in humans suggest that further research may have both practical and theoretical significance.