Abstract
The Chomsky/Piaget debate is an iteration of a quarrel which fueled philosophical reflexion for centuries. There is no reason to believe, however, that this opposition cannot be overcome. The concept of “languaging” set us on that track by avoiding both internalism and individualism which form the background of this historical debate. The naturalistic program is thus reconfigured. Whether we should accept this solution or not, there is indeed some actuality in this debate : if the solution is not satisfactory, then the debate shows an ambiguity we should not try to overcome ; if it is, we shall evaluate our progress in the way we link our knowledge of nature and language.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
