Abstract

Hincmar of Rheims, in his treatise Ad reclusos et simplices, quotes a short extract of a Letter of Gottschalk to Gislemar, monk of Corbie. Actually, this text is excerpted from S. Augustine’s De correptione et gratia 7, 14 and, second distinctive feature, it forms - before some practical recommendations - the conclusion of the Opuscule théologique XVIII of Gottschalk (edition of Dom Lambot). Consequently : 1. It becomes possible to reconstruct as a whole the De praedestinatione which is the supposed Letter to Gislemar, by reading one after the other the Opuscules théologiques VII, XI and XII, XIV, XV and XVI, ending with XVIII. The other Opuscules (VIII, IX, X and XIII) are a collection of Sentences de l’Écriture et des saints Pères, which preserves the content of the booklet Gottschalk was forced to burn, as a result of its condemnation at the council of Quierzy (Spring 849). 2. The condemnation of a text of Augustine in order to denounce a supposed error of Gottschalk resulted in a complete loss of credit of the accusation by Hincmar before the bishops. It is thus suitable to revise the procedures against Gottschalk and to establish that he is not a heretic and consequently that there is no controversy on the double predestination until Hincmar raised it when he asked for an examination by John Scot of the Augustinian doctrine as defended by Gottschalk.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.