Abstract
The ability to adapt to changing environments is crucial for survival and has evolved based on socio-ecological factors. Goats and sheep are closely related, with similar social structures, body sizes and domestication levels, but different feeding ecologies, i.e. goats are browsers and sheep are grazers. We investigated whether goats' reliance on more patchily distributed food sources predicted an increased behavioural flexibility compared to sheep. We tested 21 goats and 28 sheep in a spatial A-not-B detour task. Subjects had to navigate around a straight barrier through a gap at its edge. After one, two, three or four of these initial A trials, the gap was moved to the opposite end and subjects performed four B trials. Behaviourally more flexible individuals should move through the new gap faster, while those less behaviourally flexible should show greater perseveration. While both species showed an accuracy reduction following the change of the gap position, goats recovered from this perseveration error from the second B trial onwards, whereas sheep did so only in the fourth B trial, indicating differences in behavioural flexibility between the species. This higher degree of flexibility in goats compared to sheep could be linked to differences in their foraging strategies.
Highlights
The ability to adapt to changing environments is crucial for survival and has evolved based on socio-ecological factors
We investigated whether goats’ reliance on more patchily distributed food sources predicted an increased behavioural flexibility compared to sheep
While both species showed an accuracy reduction following the change of the gap position, goats recovered from this perseveration error from the second B trial onwards, whereas sheep did so only in the fourth B trial, indicating differences in behavioural flexibility between the species
Summary
The ability to adapt to changing environments is crucial for survival and has evolved based on socio-ecological factors. In addition to assessing spatial problem-solving and inhibitory control, this task can measure the individuals’ capacity for reversal learning by changing the layout In this arrangement, a perseveration error, called the A-not-B error, occurs when a subject attempts to use a previously reinforced detour path despite a visible barrier shift that requires a new route [13]. The spatial A-not-B detour task approach of McKenzie & Bigelow [13], developed for infants, offers a set-up that is adaptable for all mobile species Recent studies using this task found that dogs [15] and horses (Equus caballus) [16] persistently committed perseveration errors, whereas mules (Equus asinus x Equus caballus) and donkeys (Equus asinus) showed a higher level of behavioural flexibility [16]. These inter-species comparisons of cognitive capacities are useful to identify possible evolutionary reasons for differences, which can be taken as inspiration for studies with additional species
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
