Abstract
In 2023, Alan Garrow published ‘Gnats, Camels, and Matthew’s Use of Luke’ (JSNT 45/3). There, he responds to several authors who engaged critically with various aspects of the Matthean Posteriority Hypothesis in synoptic studies (Matthew uses Mark and Luke; no Q). A section of Garrow’s article contains an extensive response to my Expository Times article (133/6). In his rejoinder, Garrow makes use of several arguments from Robert H. Gundry’s “Peter: False Disciple and Apostate according to Saint Matthew” (2015), which was featured as the Book of the Month in the Expository Times (127/9). In this article, I respond to Garrow and, subsidiarily, to Gundry.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
