Abstract

Background and AimsGM-CSF-dependent macrophage polarization has been demonstrated in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Our aim was to seek diagnostic/prognostic biomarkers for undifferentiated arthritis (UA) by analyzing GM-CSF expression and source, macrophage polarization and density in joints of patients with UA evolving to RA or PsA compared with established RA or PsA, respectively.MethodsSynovial tissue (ST) from patients with UA evolving to RA (UA>RA, n=8), PsA (UA>PsA, n=9), persistent UA (UA, n=16), established RA (n=12) and PsA (n=10), and healthy controls (n=6), were analyzed. Cell source and quantitative expression of GM-CSF and proteins associated with pro-inflammatory (GM-CSF-driven) and anti-inflammatory (M-CSF-driven) macrophage polarization (activin A, TNFα, MMP12, and CD209, respectively) were assessed in ST CD163+ macrophages by multicolor immunofluorescence. GM-CSF and activin A levels were also quantified in paired synovial fluid samples. CD163+ macrophage density was determined in all groups by immunofluorescence.ResultsSynovial stromal cells (FAP+ CD90+ fibroblast, CD90+ endothelial cells) and CD163+ sublining macrophages were the sources of GM-CSF. ST CD163+ macrophages from all groups expressed pro-inflammatory polarization markers (activin A, TNFα, and MMP12). Expression of the M-CSF-dependent anti-inflammatory marker CD209 identified two macrophage subsets (CD163+ CD209high and CD163+ CD209low/-). CD209+ macrophages were more abundant in ST from healthy controls and PsA patients, although both macrophage subtypes showed similar levels of pro-inflammatory markers in all groups. In paired synovial fluid samples, activin A was detected in all patients, with higher levels in UA>RA and RA, while GM-CSF was infrequently detected. ST CD163+ macrophage density was comparable between UA>RA and UA>PsA patients, but significantly higher than in persistent UA.ConclusionsGM-CSF is highly expressed by sublining CD90+ FAP+ synovial fibroblasts, CD90+ activated endothelium and CD163+ macrophages in different types of arthritis. The polarization state of ST macrophages was similar in all UA and established arthritis groups, with a predominance of pro-inflammatory GM-CSF-associated markers. CD163+ macrophage density was significantly higher in the UA phases of RA and PsA compared with persistent UA. Taken together, our findings support the idea that GM-CSF is a strong driver of macrophage polarization and a potential therapeutic target not only in RA but also in PsA and all types of UA.

Highlights

  • Undifferentiated arthritis (UA) is frequent in early arthritis clinics, with a prevalence of 30%–50% [1,2,3]

  • Given the putative pathological role of GranulocyteMacrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) and M-CSF in synovitis [24,25,26], our aims were to seek diagnostic/prognostic biomarkers by analyzing potential differences in GM-CSF expression and its cellular source, and CD163+ macrophage polarization and density in joints of patients with UA evolving to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) compared with persistent UA and established RA or PsA, respectively

  • Our results show that the density of CD163+ macrophages is significantly higher in UA evolving to RA or PsA compared with persistent UA

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Undifferentiated arthritis (UA) is frequent in early arthritis clinics, with a prevalence of 30%–50% [1,2,3]. RA and peripheral PsA are chronic inflammatory diseases mediated by the immune system and, joint damage may be early and frequent in both diseases if not treated, their pathogenesis may be different regarding the relative implication of the adaptive and innate immune systems in each of them. This is illustrated by therapies that are useful in treating RA (antiCD20, rituximab; CTL4-IgG, abatacept; anti- IL6 R, tocilizumab) but not PsA. Our aim was to seek diagnostic/prognostic biomarkers for undifferentiated arthritis (UA) by analyzing GM-CSF expression and source, macrophage polarization and density in joints of patients with UA evolving to RA or PsA compared with established RA or PsA, respectively

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call